Marvin P. Moseley, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 17, 1999
05980256 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 17, 1999)

05980256

06-17-1999

Marvin P. Moseley, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Marvin P. Moseley v. United States Postal Service

05980256

June 17, 1999

Marvin P. Moseley, )

Appellant, )

) Request No. 05980256

v. ) Appeal No. 01972583

)

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

)

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

On January 6, 1998, Marvin P. Moseley (hereinafter referred to as

appellant) initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (the Commission) to reconsider the decision in Marvin

P. Moseley v. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster General, United States

Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01972583 (December 5, 1997), received

by appellant on December 13, 1997. EEOC regulations provide that

the Commissioners may, in their discretion, reconsider any previous

Commission decision. 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(a). The party requesting

reconsideration must submit written argument or evidence which tends to

establish one or more of the following three criteria: new and material

evidence is available that was not readily available when the previous

decision was issued, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(1); the previous decision

involved an erroneous interpretation of law, regulation, or material fact,

or a misapplication of established policy, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(2);

and the decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(3).

After a review of appellant's request for reconsideration, the agency's

response thereto, the previous decision, and the entire record, the

Commission finds that appellant's request does not meet the criteria in

29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c). Therefore, it is the decision of the Commission

to deny appellant's request.<1> The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01972583

(December 5, 1997) remains the Commission's final decision. The agency

shall comply with the provisions of the Order set forth below. There is

no further right of administrative appeal on a decision of the Commission

on this Request for Reconsideration.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to comply with provision 2a of the settlement

agreement. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision

becomes final, the agency shall supplement the record with evidence,

e.g., a statement by Labor Relations Representative A or a statement by

the Postmaster of the Yuba City Post Office, indicating that the agency

has implemented the terms of provision 2a regarding the response that

the agency would provide to inquiries regarding appellant's employment

with the agency. A copy of the documentation showing that the agency has

complied with provision 2a of the settlement agreement must be submitted

to the Compliance Officer, as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

June 17, 1999

Date Frances M. Hart

Executive Officer

Executive Secretariat

1Appellant has not shown that the information concerning 1997 job

vacancies was unavailable at the time the previous decision was issued.

Although appellant asserted that he assumed he would be contacted if such

information was necessary, appellant was specifically advised, by letter

from the Commission's Office of Federal Operations dated February 11,

1997, that any statement in support of his appeal must be filed within 30

days of filing the appeal and that any material submitted beyond that

time would not be considered. Appellant also has not provided any

evidence showing that potential employers requested information from the

agency or declined to hire him based upon such information. Specifically,

Person A appears to be the secretary of appellant's attorney and not

affiliated with a potential employer. Finally, the previous decision

correctly noted that Commission precedent provides that complainants are

not entitled to damages for breach of settlement allegations. See Kessler

v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05970446 (February 26, 1999).