Marketta M. Nelson, Complainant,v.Colin L. Powell, Secretary, Department of State, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 12, 2002
01A14132_r (E.E.O.C. Jun. 12, 2002)

01A14132_r

06-12-2002

Marketta M. Nelson, Complainant, v. Colin L. Powell, Secretary, Department of State, Agency.


Marketta M. Nelson v. Department of State

01A14132

June 12, 2003

.

Marketta M. Nelson,

Complainant,

v.

Colin L. Powell,

Secretary,

Department of State,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A14132

Agency No. 00-71

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

agency's May 23, 2001 determination that it was in compliance with

the terms of the February 23, 2001 settlement agreement into which the

parties entered. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.402; 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504(b);

and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.

The settlement agreement provided, in pertinent part, that:

(4c) Retroactive Detail: Within 30 days of the effective date of this

Agreement, the Department will cut a Notice of Personnel Action (SF-50)

reflecting that the complainant was detailed to a GS-09 Secretary

position from November 1, 1998 through November 21, 1999.

(4d) Back Pay: Within 30 days of the effective date of this agreement,

the Department will pay to the Complainant all back pay and benefits less

amounts actually received or accrued as a result of her employment by the

Department, plus interest if and to the extent permitted by applicable

federal law, which have accrued if Complainant had been detailed to a

GS-09 Secretary position from November 1, 1998 through November 21, 1999.

(Back pay and benefits shall be calculated under the Back Pay Act, 5

U.S.C. 5596, and accompanying regulations at 5 C.F.R. 550.801 et seq.,

and shall be subject to the provisions of 29 C.F.R. 1614.501.)

By letter to the agency dated April 23, 2001, complainant alleged that

the agency breached the settlement agreement, and requested that the

agency specifically implement its terms. Specifically, complainant

alleged that the agency failed to pay her the attorney's fees and back

pay owed under the agreement.

In a letter dated May 23, 2001, the agency concluded that it did not

breach the agreement. The agency noted that it had paid complainant

attorney's fees in the amount of $7,194.25. The agency also stated

that it was forwarding to complainant a copy of a document illustrating

back pay and interest calculations used to determine the amount owed to

complainant for her retroactive promotion to GS-9 secretary. On appeal,

complainant states that the agency has paid her the appropriate attorney's

fees, but has yet to pay her the promised back pay.

In the instant matter, the Commission is unable to ascertain from the

record whether the agency breached the agreement. On appeal, the agency's

only submission on the issue of back pay is a cryptic document ostensibly

reflecting complainant's pay for pay periods in 2000 and 2001. However,

the record does not indicate if the agency has properly calculated the

back pay and benefits due to complainant as a GS-09 secretary from

November 1, 1998 until November 21, 1999, offset by the salary and

benefits complainant actually received during this period.<1> Moreover,

the agency failed to supplement the record with any evidence that it has

in fact paid complainant back pay and benefits due under the agreement,

such as a copy of the check tendered to complainant for the sum of back

pay owed. In light of the deficiencies in the record, the Commission

VACATES the agency's finding of no settlement breach and REMANDS this

matter to the agency for a supplemental investigation in accordance with

the Order below.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to take the following action:

The agency shall conduct a supplemental investigation regarding

whether it breached the instant settlement agreement. Specifically,

the agency shall explicitly calculate the amount of salary and benefits

complainant is owed as a GS-9 secretary from November 1, 1998 until

November 21, 1999, offset by the amount paid to complainant during that

same period of time. The agency shall provide a copy of any check made

to complainant pursuant to its obligation to pay back pay and benefits

under the agreement. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date that

this decision becomes final, the agency shall determine, in writing,

whether or not the settlement agreement has been breached. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.504(b). The agency shall supplement the record with

any other relevant documentation supporting its determination, along

with a precise explanation of what is reflected in such documentation.

A copy of the new decision must be sent to the Compliance Officer as

referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__June 12, 2002________________

Date

1We note that the record contains documents

(SF-50s) indicating that the agency retroactively promoted complainant to

a GS-9 secretary position from November 1, 1998 until November 21, 1999.

However, these documents do not reflect that complainant received back

pay and benefits owed for the retroactive promotion.