01994840
05-18-2000
Margaret Greene, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast/Southwest Region), Agency.
Margaret Greene v. United States Postal Service
01994840
May 18, 2000
.
Margaret Greene,
Complainant,
v.
William J. Henderson,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
(Southeast/Southwest Region),
Agency.
Appeal No. 01994840
Agency No. 4H-330-1548-96
Hearing No. 150-98-8555X
DECISION
Complainant timely initiated an appeal from a final agency decision
(FAD) dismissing her complaint, pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656
(1999)(to be codified at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)).<1> Complainant
alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race
(Black), sex (female) and in reprisal for prior protected activity when
on April 29, 1996, she was told to report to Consumer Affairs for a
detail assignment instead of being returned to her permanent position.
The agency accepted this complaint for processing and at the conclusion
of the investigation, complainant requested a hearing before an EEOC
Administrative Judge (AJ). The assigned AJ reviewed the file and
remanded the complaint to the agency finding that the issue raised by
complainant was essentially the same issue she raised in agency case
nos. 4H-330-1706-95 and 4H-330-1125-96 which was addressed by an EEOC AJ
in a Recommended Decision following a two day hearing in Miami, Florida.
Upon review we concur with the AJ's finding that complainant is
essentially alleging that she was forced to take a detail assignment that
she did not want, a claim based on the same set of facts and circumstances
as the detail assignment claim raised in the above referenced agency
cases. We conclude that complainant has failed to state a claim upon
which relief can be granted in so far as she is not entitled to any
further relief than that awarded in agency case nos. 4H-330-1706-95 and
4H-330-1125-96. Accordingly, we affirm the agency's dismissal.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0300)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED
WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS
OF RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION.See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management
Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9,
1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director,
Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,
P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible
postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it
is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable
filing period. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified
and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or
opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION(S0400)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE
DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD
OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND
OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case
in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and
not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court
appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to
file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e
et seq .; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791,
794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion
of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
May 18, 2000
__________________
Date
1 On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all
federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative
process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.