Lorrainev.Motta, Appellant, v. Robert E. Rubin, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 19, 1999
01982902 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 19, 1999)

01982902

03-19-1999

Lorraine V. Motta, Appellant, v. Robert E. Rubin, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.


Lorraine V. Motta v. Department of the Treasury

01982902

March 19, 1999

Lorraine V. Motta, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01982902

) Agency No. 982035

Robert E. Rubin, )

Secretary, )

Department of the Treasury, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

Based on a review of the record, we find that the agency properly

dismissed appellant's complaint, pursuant to EEOC Regulation 29

C.F.R. �1614.107(b), for untimely filing of her formal complaint.

Appellant alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the basis

of reprisal for EEO activities when:

On August 22, 1997, appellant became ill from exposure to the Port

Director's cigarette smoking, for which she developed an asthmatic

condition;

On September 2, 1997, appellant was not designated as acting Port

Director; and

On October 30, 1997, appellant was denied a performance award for

Fiscal Year 1997.

On October 20, 1997, appellant received a Notice of Right to File a

Discrimination Complaint, which clearly stated that she had 15 calendar

days after receipt of said notice to file a formal complaint. Appellant

filed her complaint on November 5, 1997, sixteen days after receipt of

the notice. In a letter dated January 30, 1998, appellant states that

after she received the notice, she had to call the local counselor four

times for information to complete her response. Specifically, appellant

stated that she did not receive copies of interview statements and also

that there was an error in one of the interviewee's names which she

requested the Counselor to correct. Appellant contends that she mailed

the complaint at 3:00PM on November 4, 1997, but assumes that the post

office did not postmark it until the next day.

On February 12, 1998, the agency issued a final decision dismissing

appellant's complaint for failure to file a formal complaint in a timely

manner. The agency found appellant's justification inadequate for an

extension of the time limits pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(a)(2).

We agree.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.106(b) requires the filing of a written

complaint with an appropriate agency official within fifteen (15)

calendar days after the date of receipt of the notice of the right to

file a complaint required by 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(d), (e) or (f).

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(b) provides that the agency shall

dismiss a complaint or a portion of a complaint that fails to comply

with the applicable time limits contained in ��1614.105, 1614.106, and

1614.204(c), unless the agency extends the time limits in accordance

with �1614.604(c).

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(b), a document is deemed timely if

it is delivered in person or postmarked before the expiration of the

applicable filing period, or, in the absence of a legible postmark,

if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the

applicable filing period. The record in this case indicates that

appellant received a notice of the right to file a formal discrimination

complaint on October 20, 1997. The notice informed appellant that she

had fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice in which to

file a formal complaint. The record further reflects that appellant

did not file a formal complaint within fifteen days of his receipt of

this notice but, instead filed the formal complaint on November 5, 1997.

Appellant asserts that she was delayed in filing her formal complaint

because she had to call the EEO counselor four times to get information.

However, we find this reason to be inadequate since the information

requested, i.e., was not information that appellant needed in order to

complete her formal complaint. Therefore, we find that appellant failed

to present adequate justification, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c),

for extending the filing period. Accordingly, the agency's decision is

hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT

IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

March 19, 1999 Ronnie Blumenthal

DATE Director

Office of Federal Operations