Local 225 United Security Guards of America (Planned Building Services)

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Aug 26, 2005

345 N.L.R.B. 18 (N.L.R.B. 2005)

345 NLRB No. 18
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
Local 225, United Security Guards of America
(Planned Building Services, Inc.) and Local
32B–32J, Service Employees International Un-
ion.1 Case 2–CB–18738–1
August 26, 2005
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN BATTISTA AND MEMBERS LIEBMAN
AND SCHAUMBER
The General Counsel seeks a default judgment in this
case on the ground that the Respondent has failed to file
an answer to the complaint. Upon a charge filed on
March 6, 2002, by Local 32B–32J, Service Employees
International Union (Local 32B–32J) against Local 225,
United Security Guards of America (the Respondent) and
upon charges filed by Local 32B–32J against Planned
Building Services, Inc. (PBS), an Order consolidating
cases, consolidated complaint, and notice of hearing is-
sued on May 31, 2002, alleging, in pertinent part, that the
Respondent had engaged in unfair labor practices in vio-
lation of Section 8(b)(1)(A) and (2) of the Act. The Re-
spondent failed to file an answer.2
The consolidated complaint was subsequently twice
amended based upon additional charges filed by Local
32B–32J against PBS and Local 116, Production and
Maintenance Employees Union (Local 116). However,
the substance of the allegations against the Respondent
remained unchanged. The Respondent did not file an
answer to either of the amended consolidated com-
plaints.3 On April 22, 2005, the Regional Director for

1 We have amended the caption to reflect the disaffiliation of the
Service Employees International Union from the AFL–CIO effective
July 25, 2005.
2 The charge in Case 2–CB–18738–1 was initially served by regular
mail on the Respondent, through its representative Gregg McCarthy, at
233 East Shore Road, Great Neck, New York 11023. The mail was
returned to the Board undelivered. On April 15, 2002, McCarthy con-
tacted the Region by telephone and stated that the Respondent’s correct
address was 100 Summit Drive, Manhasset, New York 11030. On
April 16, 2002, a copy of the charge was mailed to McCarthy at the
Manhasset address.
The consolidated complaint was initially served on the Respondent
by regular mail at the Great Neck address. On June 18, 2002, the con-
solidated complaint, along with a letter advising that the General Coun-
sel would seek summary judgment if no answer was timely filed, was
served on the Respondent by certified mail at the Manhasset address.
3 The General Counsel issued an Order amending consolidated com-
plaint, amended consolidated complaint, and notice of hearing on
March 26, 2003, and an Order further amending consolidated com-
plaint, amended consolidated complaint, and notice of hearing on Au-
gust 29, 2003. Initially, these documents were inadvertently sent to
Respondent’s former address in Great Neck. Upon discovery of this
Region 2 issued an Order severing cases, specifically
severing the instant case involving the Respondent (Case
2–CB–18738–1) from Cases 2–CA–33687–1, 2–CA–
34430–1, 2–CA–34431–1, 2–CA–34713–1, 2–CB–
18922–1, and 2–CA–35577–1, which allege unfair labor
practices by PBS and Local 116.4
On May 16, 2005, the General Counsel filed with the
Board a Motion for Default Judgment and memorandum
in support. On May 25, 2005, the Board issued an order
transferring the proceeding to the Board and a Notice to
Show Cause why the motion should not be granted. The
Respondent did not file a response. The allegations in
the motion are therefore undisputed.
Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment
Section 102.20 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations
provides that the allegations in a complaint shall be
deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within 14 days
from service of the complaint, unless good cause is
shown. In addition, the Region affirmatively advised the
Respondent by letters dated June 17, 2002, and April 15
and 27, 2004, that all the allegations in the complaint
would be considered admitted unless the Respondent
filed a timely answer.
In the absence of good cause being shown for the fail-
ure to file an answer, we grant the General Counsel’s
motion for default judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, PBS, a corporation with an office
and place of business located at 167 Fairfield Road, Fair-
field, New Jersey, has been engaged in providing clean-
ing and maintenance services at various commercial and
residential buildings. Annually, in the course and con-
duct of its business operations described above, PBS
performs services valued in excess of $50,000 directly
for enterprises located outside the State of New Jersey.

error, the General Counsel served copies of these two orders, along
with letters advising that, in the absence of a timely answer, all allega-
tions would be considered admitted under Sec. 102.20 of the Board’s
Rules and Regulations, by certified mail on Respondent at the correct
Manhasset address on April 15 and April 27, 2004. The Order further
amending consolidated complaint was returned unclaimed. It is well
established that the failure or refusal to accept certified mail or to pro-
vide for proper service cannot serve to defeat the purposes of the Act.
See, e.g., I.C.E. Electric, Inc., 339 NLRB 247 (2003); Michigan Expe-
diting Service, 282 NLRB 210 fn. 6 (1986).
4 The findings of fact and conclusions of law that are issued herein
are not binding upon PBS and Local 116, and we do not pass on the
potential joint and several liability of PBS for any unfair labor practices
committed by the Respondent. See e.g., Brisben Development, Inc.,
344 NLRB No. 46, slip op. 1 fn. 1 (2005); B/E Aerospace, 323 NLRB
604 fn. 3 (1997).
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD2
We find that PBS is an employer engaged in commerce
within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and (7) of the
Act.
At all material times, Local 32B–32J and the Respon-
dent have been labor organizations within the meaning of
Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
At all material times, Gregg McCarthy has held the
position of president and has been an agent of the Re-
spondent within the meaning of Section 2(13) of the Act.
The following employees of PBS (the unit) constitute a
unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining
within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act:
All full-time and regular part-time building service em-
ployees employed by PBS at 1995 Broadway, New
York, New York, excluding all office clerical employ-
ees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
On October 6, 2000, a valid petition was filed in Case
2–RC–22295, seeking an election among the unit em-
ployees, which unit includes the concierge/watchmen
employed at 1995 Broadway.
On or about December 18, 2000, Local 32B–32J was
certified as the exclusive collective-bargaining represen-
tative of the unit. At all material times since December
18, 2000, based on Section 9(a) of the Act, Local 32B–
32J has been the exclusive collective-bargaining repre-
sentative of the unit.
During the pendency of Case 2–RC–22295, on or
about December 6, 2000, the Respondent obtained rec-
ognition from PBS and entered into a collective-
bargaining agreement with it as the exclusive representa-
tive, for the purpose of collective-bargaining, for a bar-
gaining unit of all full-time and regular part-time watch-
men employed at 1995 Broadway, New York, New
York. This collective-bargaining agreement was effec-
tive from December 6, 2000, through December 5, 2003.
The collective-bargaining agreement between PBS and
the Respondent contains union security and dues check-
off provisions in articles II and III respectively. PBS and
the Respondent have maintained and enforced the terms
of the collective-bargaining agreement, including the
union security and dues checkoff provisions.
Since on or about December 6, 2000, PBS has de-
ducted sums of money as union dues, initiation fees, and
assessments from wages of employees in the unit pursu-
ant to its collective-bargaining agreement with the Re-
spondent, and has remitted that money to the Respon-
dent.
The Respondent obtained recognition and a contract
from PBS at a time when PBS was not privileged to ex-
tend recognition and grant a contract because of the then-
pending valid petition for an election described above.
Moreover, that conduct continued notwithstanding PBS’
obligation, as of December 18, 2000, to recognize and
bargain with Local 32B–32J as the certified collective-
bargaining representative of the unit.
Since in or about March 2001, PBS and Local 32B–
32J have been negotiating for an initial collective-
bargaining agreement. Local 32B–32J did not know, nor
did it have reason to know, until a December 18, 2001
bargaining session with PBS, that PBS had recognized
the Respondent and entered into a collective-bargaining
agreement with it on or about December 6, 2000.
Since on or about March 6, 2001, PBS has failed and
refused to recognize 32B–32J as the collective-
bargaining representative for its concierge/watchmen and
has failed and refused to bargain with Local 32B–32J
concerning this classification. The concierge/watchmen
are included in the unit described above.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. By obtaining recognition from PBS and entering
into a collective-bargaining agreement with it even
though a valid petition had been filed seeking an election
among the unit employees, and by maintaining and en-
forcing union security and checkoff provisions of its col-
lective-bargaining agreement with PBS, the Respondent
has restrained and coerced employees in the exercise of
the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act, in violation
of Section 8(b)(1)(A) of the Act.
2. By accepting union dues, initiation fees, and as-
sessments deducted from employees’ wages and remitted
by PBS pursuant to the collective-bargaining agreement,
the Respondent has restrained and coerced employees in
the exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the
Act, in violation of Section 8(b)(1)(A) of the Act, and
has violated Section 8(b)(2) of the Act by attempting to
cause PBS to discriminate against employees in violation
of Section 8(a)(3) of the Act.
3. The Respondent’s unfair labor practices affect
commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of
the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent has violated Section
8(b)(1)(A) and (2) of the Act by obtaining recognition
from PBS and entering into, maintaining, and enforcing a
collective-bargaining agreement with PBS, which in-
cludes union-security and checkoff provisions, we shall
order the Respondent to reimburse watchmen employees
LOCAL 225 UNITED SECURITY GUARDS OF AMERICA (PBS) 3
for all union dues, initiation fees, or assessments ob-
tained pursuant to the union-security provisions of the
collective-bargaining agreement, with interest as pro-
vided in New Horizons for the Retarded, 283 NLRB
1173 (1987).
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Local 225, United Security Guards of
America, Manhasset, New York, its officers, agents, and
representatives, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Acting as the collective-bargaining representative
of the watchmen employees employed by Planned Build-
ing Services, Inc. (PBS) at 1995 Broadway, New York,
New York, unless and until Local 225 is certified by the
Board as the exclusive representative of those employ-
ees.
(b) Entering into, maintaining, or enforcing any collec-
tive-bargaining agreement between it and PBS covering
the watchmen employees described above, unless and
until it is certified by the Board as the exclusive repre-
sentative of those employees.
(c) In any like or related manner restraining or coerc-
ing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed
them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) Reimburse all present and former watchmen em-
ployees employed by PBS at 1995 Broadway, New York,
New York, since December 6, 2000, for all union dues,
initiation fees, or assessments that may have been paid or
withheld from their pay pursuant to the union-security
provisions of the collective-bargaining agreement be-
tween the Respondent and PBS effective from December
6, 2000, through December 5, 2003, with interest as pro-
vided for in the remedy section of this decision.
(b) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request or such
additional time as the Regional Director may allow for
good cause shown, provide at a reasonable place desig-
nated by the Board or its agents, all payroll records, so-
cial security payment records, timecards, personnel re-
cords and reports, and all other records, including an
electronic copy of such records if stored in electronic
form, necessary to analyze the amount of backpay due
under the terms of this Order.
(c) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its union offices in Manhasset, New York, copies of the
attached notice marked “Appendix.”5 Copies of the no-

5 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
tice, on forms provided by the Regional Director for Re-
gion 2, after being signed by the Respondent’s author-
ized representative, shall be posted by the Respondent
and maintained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous
places, including all places where notices to members are
customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by
the Respondent to ensure that the notices are not altered,
defaced, or covered by any other material.
(d) Sign and return to the Regional Director sufficient
copies of the notice for posting by PBS, if willing, at all
places where notices to employees are customarily
posted.
(e) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
Dated, Washington, D.C. August 26, 2005
Robert J. Battista, Chairman
Wilma B. Liebman, Member
Peter C. Schaumber, Member
(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we
violated Federal labor law and has ordered us to post and
obey this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join, or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on your
behalf
Act together with other employees for your benefit
and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected ac-
tivities.

ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD4
WE WILL NOT act as the collective-bargaining repre-
sentative of the watchmen employees employed by
Planned Building Services, Inc. (PBS), at 1995 Broad-
way, New York, New York, unless and until we have
been certified by the Board as the exclusive representa-
tive of those employees.
WE WILL NOT enter into, maintain, or enforce any col-
lective-bargaining agreement between us and PBS cov-
ering the watchmen employees described above, unless
and until we are certified by the Board as the exclusive
representative of those employees.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner restrain or
coerce you in the exercise of the rights guaranteed you
by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL reimburse all present and former watchmen
employees employed by Planned Building Services, Inc.
(PBS), at 1995 Broadway, New York, New York, since
December 6, 2000, for all union dues, initiation fees, or
assessments that may have been paid or withheld from
their pay pursuant to the union-security provisions of the
collective-bargaining agreement between us and PBS
effective from December 6, 2000, through December 5,
2003, with interest.
LOCAL 225, UNITED SECURITY GUARDS OF
AMERICA