Linda C. Jutras, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Northeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 7, 2002
05A20281 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 7, 2002)

05A20281

11-07-2002

Linda C. Jutras, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Northeast Area), Agency.


Linda C. Jutras v. United States Postal Service

05A20281

November 7, 2002

.

Linda C. Jutras,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Northeast Area),

Agency.

Request No. 05A20281

Appeal No. 01992623

Agency No. 1B-029-0014-97

Hearing No. 160-98-8046X

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Linda C. Jutras (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the

decision in Linda C. Jutras v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal

No. 01992623 (December 20, 2001). Complainant alleged that the agency

violated Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation

Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.<1> Complainant alleged that

she was discriminated against on the bases of disability (unspecified)

and reprisal for prior EEO activity under the Rehabilitation Act when:

on February 8, 1997, her supervisor informed other management officials,

male coworkers, and the Postal Inspector that they could put her �in

shock� because she lost her EEO complaint;

on April 9, 1997, she was placed on administrative leave pending a

fitness-for-duty examination; and

on May 20, 1997, she was ordered to sign a Last Chance Agreement or

be terminated.

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion,

reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party

demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision

will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations

of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

After a review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the previous

decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request

fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the

decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC

Appeal No. 01992623 remains the Commission's final decision. There is no

further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission

on this request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 7, 2002

__________________

Date

1 The Rehabilitation Act was amended in 1992

to apply the standards in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

to complaints of discrimination by federal employees or applicants

for employment.