LG Electronics Inc.Download PDFPatent Trials and Appeals BoardMar 26, 2021IPR2020-01164 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 26, 2021) Copy Citation Trials@uspto.gov Paper No. 19 Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: March 26, 2021 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ____________ HISENSE VISUAL TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD., Petitioner, v. LG ELECTRONICS INC., Patent Owner. ____________ IPR2020-01164 Patent No. 9,271,191 IPR2020-01208 Patent No. 7,839,452 ____________ Before ROBERT J. WEINSCHENK, GARTH D. BAER, and SCOTT E. BAIN, Administrative Patent Judges. BAIN, Administrative Patent Judge. TERMINATION Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial 35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. § 42.74 IPR2020-01164, IPR2020-01208 Patent No. 9,271,191, Patent No. 7,839,452 2 On March 3, 2021, pursuant to our authorization, the parties filed Joint Motions to Terminate proceedings in the above-captioned cases. Paper 17 (“Motion”).1 Accompanying the motion, the parties filed copies of a settlement and license agreement (“Settlement Agreement”), along with a Joint Request To Treat Settlement Agreement As Business Confidential Information, to be kept separate from the files of the involved patent and inter partes review pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74. Ex. 1053; Paper 18. The parties state that the Settlement Agreement “settles all disputes” between Petitioner and Patent Owner regarding the patents in the above- captioned cases. Paper 17, 1. The parties further state that they are “unaware of any other pending proceedings relating to the [subject patents] before the Board, or any other matter before the USPTO that would be affected by the requested termination of this proceeding[s].” Id. We granted institution of inter partes review in these proceedings on January 7, 2021. Paper 15. Nevertheless, these proceedings are at an early stage. Under these circumstances, we determine that it is appropriate to terminate the proceedings. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5(a), 42.71(a). This paper does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 318(a). As requested by the parties, the Settlement Agreement will be treated as business confidential information and kept separate from the patent files. 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). Accordingly, it is 1 Our Decision refers to the paper numbers associated with IPR2020-01164. The filings in IPR2020-01208 are essentially identical. IPR2020-01164, IPR2020-01208 Patent No. 9,271,191, Patent No. 7,839,452 3 ORDERED that the Joint Motions to Dismiss and Terminate IPR2020-01164 and IPR2020-01208 are granted; FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Requests to have their Settlement Agreement treated as business confidential information, to be kept separate from the patent files, are granted; and FURTHER ORDERED that the proceedings in IPR2020-01164 and IPR2020-01208 are terminated. For PETITIONER: Peter Chen Anupam Sharma COVINGTON & BURLING pchen@cov.com asharma@cov.com For PATENT OWNER: Peter Kang Theodore Chandler BAKER BOTTS LLP Peter.kang@bakerbotts.com Ted.chandler@bakerbotts.com Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation