Lee A. Meek, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 25, 2007
0120073253 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 25, 2007)

0120073253

09-25-2007

Lee A. Meek, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Lee A. Meek,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120073253

Agency No. 1H381003307

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

agency's decision dated June 18, 2007, dismissing his complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

791 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's

complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2),

for untimely EEO Counselor contact.

In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to

discrimination on the bases of disability and reprisal for prior protected

EEO activity under an EEO statute that was unspecified in the record

when in January 2001 he was placed in non-pay status and subsequently

removed effective May 7, 2004.

The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event occurred no

later than May 7, 2004, but complainant did not initiate contact with an

EEO Counselor until February 23, 2007, over two and one-half years beyond

the forty-five (45) day limitation period. On appeal, complainant has

presented no persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an extension of

the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact.1 Accordingly, the

agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 25, 2007

__________________

Date

1 Complainant asserts he attempted to contact a counselor on July 29,

2004, after he "verified" his removal, but was told that his contact

was untimely so he did not pursue the matter. Complainant has not

established, however, that he was unaware of his removal prior to this

time. The agency asserted it mailed him a notice of removal by regular

mail by letter dated March 30, 2004. This notice clearly stated that

the removal was effective on May 7, 2004. Complainant has not disputed

his receipt of the letter, nor has he established he was unaware of the

timeframes for seeking EEO counseling. In fact, the record indicates

that he had previous EEO activity.

??

??

??

??

2

0120073253

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120073253