Laura A. Jackson, Complainant,v.Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 25, 2003
05A30978 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 25, 2003)

05A30978

09-25-2003

Laura A. Jackson, Complainant, v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Laura A. Jackson v. Department of Veterans Affairs

05A30978

09-25-03

.

Laura A. Jackson,

Complainant,

v.

Anthony J. Principi,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Request No. 05A30978

Appeal No. 01A21199

Agency No. 200O7-654-2001300263

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

On June 26, 2003, Laura A. Jackson (complainant) initiated a request

to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to

reconsider the decision in Laura A. Jackson v. Department of Veterans

Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 01A21199 (March 19, 2003). Pursuant to 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), requests to reconsider (RTR), with supporting

statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations

(OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the appeal decision.

The 30th day following March 19, 2003 was April 18, 3002. Allowing five

days for delivery of the March 19, 2003 appeal decision, the complainant

should have received it by March 24, 2003 and the latest date by which

to file an RTR would have been 30 days after March 24, 2003, or April

23, 2003.

Complainant asked that the time limits for filing the RTR be waived,

explaining that she was motivated to file her RTR when on June 19,

2003 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied a

motion, and because complainant had new evidence to support her claims.

Complainant's RTR then detailed her earlier claims against the agency,

and referred to a May 28, 2003 report to an EEO investigator about a

�hidden retirement document�. Complainant's RTR did not explain the

June 19, 2003 decision from the United States Court of Appeals.

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion,

reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party

demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision

will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations

of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

After a review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the

previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that

the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

While the time limits in 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 are subject to equitable

tolling, complainant advanced no persuasive reasons why the time limits

for filing an RTR should be waived. Therefore, it is the decision of the

Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A21199

remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further right of

administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request

for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

_____09-25-03_____________

Date