01981553
02-04-1999
Latanya M. Cooper, Appellant, v. Robert E. Rubin, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.
Latanya M. Cooper v. Department of the Treasury
01981553
February 4, 1999
Latanya M. Cooper, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01981553
) Agency No. 97-2236
Robert E. Rubin, )
Secretary, )
Department of the Treasury, )
Agency. )
)
DECISION
The Commission finds that the agency's November 3, 1997 decision
dismissing appellant's complaint on the grounds of untimely EEO
counselor contact, for failure to state a claim, and because appellant
had raised the matter in a negotiated grievance procedure that allowed
allegations of discrimination, is proper pursuant to the provisions of
29 C.F.R. �1614.107(b), (a) and (d).
The record shows that appellant sought EEO counseling on April 21,
1997, alleging that she had been discriminated against on the bases of
race (African American), color (black), sex (female), national origin
(U.S. citizen), physical disability (lumbar sprain, recurrent headaches
and post traumatic stress disorder) and reprisal for prior EEO activity.
After the EEO counselor's inquiry of her informal complaint, appellant
filed a formal complaint of discrimination on June 6, 1997. The record
further shows that on January 13, 1997, almost 6 months before filing
her formal complaint of discrimination, appellant had filed a grievance
pursuant to the agency's collective bargaining agreement which allowed
allegations of discrimination. The agreement provided that the employee
had the right to file a formal EEO complaint or a grievance, but not
both.
The agency dismissed allegations (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) of appellant's
formal complaint on the grounds of untimely EEO counselor contact.
Allegations (1), (2), (3) and (5) were also dismissed on the basis that
they had already been raised in a negotiated grievance. Allegation (6)
was dismissed on the grounds of failure to state a claim. A review of
the dismissed allegations persuades the Commission that allegations (1),
(3) and (5) were properly dismissed by the agency on the grounds that
they had been previously raised in the grievance filed by appellant on
January 13, 1997. Allegations (2) and (4) were properly dismissed by the
agency on the basis of untimely EEO counselor contact. The record shows
that the alleged incidents occurred on October 17, 1996, and October 15,
1996, respectively. Nevertheless, appellant did not seek EEO counseling
until April 21, 1997, well beyond the 45-day time limit provided by
EEOC Regulations. Appellant did not provide evidence sufficient to
establish that the 45 day time limit for counselor contact should be
waived or tolled. Finally, a review of allegation (6) shows that it
was properly dismissed on the grounds of failure to state a claim.
Appellant has failed to show that she was aggrieved by the alleged
discriminatory event.
Accordingly, the agency's decision dismissing allegations (1) through
(6) is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �l6l4.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)
It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file
a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN
NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.
You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have
interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that
a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the
date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action
is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)
CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or consult
an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction
in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,
YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE
OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS
OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in
the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the
national organization, and not the local office, facility or department
in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file
a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative
processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
February 4, 1999
DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director
Office of Federal Operations