0120082729
12-12-2008
Lashonda A. Davis, Complainant, v. Michael W. Wynne, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.
Lashonda A. Davis,
Complainant,
v.
Michael W. Wynne,
Secretary,
Department of the Air Force,
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120082729
Agency No. 9R1M07045
Hearing No. 410-2008-00036X
DECISION
Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's
appeal from the agency's April 30, 2008 final order concerning her equal
employment opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging employment discrimination
in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as
amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.
Complainant alleged that the agency discriminated against her on the bases
of race (African-American), sex (female), and disability (depression)
when, on January 16, 2007, she was removed from agency employment during
her probationary period. Complainant was terminated during her 1-year
probationary period for alleged unsatisfactory work performance.
The record reflects that a hearing was held before an EEOC Administrative
Judge (AJ). After considering the testimony of the witnesses, the
AJ determined that complainant did not show by a preponderance of the
evidence that she was discriminated against on the bases of race, sex,
and disability discrimination.1 Specifically, the AJ determined that
complainant was terminated during her probationary period because she was
found to have falsely accused her co-workers of inappropriate actions,
and because of her poor work habits in the area of customer relations
and interaction with her co-workers.
After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration
of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission to AFFIRM the agency's final order
because the Administrative Judge's ultimate finding, that unlawful
employment discrimination was not proven by a preponderance of the
evidence, is supported by the record.2
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0408)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the
policies, practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the
defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
December 12, 2008
Date
1 The Commission presumes for the purposes of analysis only, and without
so finding, that complainant is an individual with a disability.
2 On appeal, complainant does not challenge a April 25, 2007 partial
dismissal issued by the agency regarding other claims (that she
was discriminated against on the bases of race, sex, and disability
when from October 2005 to December 2006, she was denied training; an
identified agency official commented that she was too skinny and was
trying to watch her weight; her request for extended hours was denied;
management harassed her by questioning her medical documentation; she was
not given a temporary clerk position; she was accused of playing games;
the Director of Personnel failed to follow up on a scheduled appointment
she had with him to discuss job-related issues; her work assignments
were changed; management informed her that she was creating a hostile
work environment; and a co-worker made remarks about her daughter).
Therefore, we have not addressed these issues in our decision.
??
??
??
??
2
0120082729
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P. O. Box 19848
Washington, D.C. 20036
3
0120082729