Larry O. Kennedy, Complainant,v.Gordon R. England, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 11, 2002
01a23789_r (E.E.O.C. Oct. 11, 2002)

01a23789_r

10-11-2002

Larry O. Kennedy, Complainant, v. Gordon R. England, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Larry O. Kennedy v. Department of the Navy

01A23789

October 11, 2002

.

Larry O. Kennedy,

Complainant,

v.

Gordon R. England,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A23789

Agency No. 02-69214-004

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's decision dated May 31,

2002, dismissing complainant's complaint for failure to state a claim

is proper pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). In his complaint,

complainant alleged that: (1) on February 22, 2002, his immediate

supervisor requested that he provide medical information to determine

and clarify what medical limitations and restrictions he may have, when

he had not requested any accommodations; and (2) on February 22, 2002,

he initiated a conversation with the supervisor concerning a possible new

staff position, but the supervisor ended the conversation by stating that

he was �not comfortable discussing the new position with [complainant].�

With regard to claim (1), the agency indicated that although complainant

did not provide the requested medical documentation in support of his

leave request, his leave was approved. Complainant does not dispute

the agency's contentions.

With regard to claim (2), the Commission has consistently held that a

remark or comment unaccompanied by concrete action is not a direct and

personal deprivation sufficient to render an individual aggrieved for

the purposes of Title VII. Henry v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05940695

(February 9, 1995). Furthermore, there is no evidence in the record to

show that complainant was subjected to any adverse action as a result

of the supervisor's refusing to provide him with more information about

a possible new position. Although complainant claimed that the alleged

claims in the complaint constituted harassment, the Commission does not

find that the alleged actions were sufficiently severe or pervasive

to alter the conditions of his employment such as to state a claim

of harassment. See Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21

(1993); Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970077

(March 13, 1997). Thus, the Commission finds that the complaint fails

to state a claim. Accordingly, the agency's decision is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 11, 2002

__________________

Date