Larry Davis, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 20, 2004
01A34503_r (E.E.O.C. Jul. 20, 2004)

01A34503_r

07-20-2004

Larry Davis, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Larry Davis v. United States Postal Service

01A34503

July 20, 2004

.

Larry Davis,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A34503

Agency No. 1J-461-0024-03

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated June 27, 2003, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. In his

complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination

on the basis of race (Black) when: on August 10, 2002, complainant was

assigned a permanent rehabilitation position with different off days.

The agency dismissed the claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2),

for untimely EEO Counselor contact. The agency stated that although the

alleged discriminatory incident occurred on August 10, 2002, complainant

failed to contact an EEO Counselor until December 19, 2002.

The record reveals that complainant received a rehabilitation job offer

for a Modified Full Time Mail Handler dated July 25, 2002, which was

rejected by complainant. On August 7, 2002, the agency subsequently

notified complainant that he was being reassigned as a Modified Full

Time Mail Handler, to become effective August 10, 2002.

The record also reveals that complainant filed an appeal with the Merit

Systems Protection Board (MSPB) on August 5, 2002, alleging that the

agency failed to honor his rights to restoration when it offered him

the July 2002 job assignment, which he rejected. A review of the MSPB

appeal reveals that complainant alleged that the job offer constituted

discrimination. In an October 10, 2002 decision, the MSPB dismissed

complainant's appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.302(b) states that if a person files

a mixed case appeal with the MSPB and the MSPB dismisses the appeal for

jurisdictional reasons, the agency shall promptly notify the individual

in writing of the right to contact an EEO counselor within 45 days

of receipt of this notice and file an EEO complaint. Further, the

regulation provides that the date on which the person filed his or her

appeal with the MSPB shall be deemed to be the date of initial contact

with the counselor.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of

discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment

Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the

matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action,

within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.

Upon review the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

improperly dismissed for untimely EEO Counselor contact. In the

present case, complainant's MSPB appeal, which was dismissed for lack

of jurisdiction, contained a discrimination claim regarding a basis

covered by the Commission. The agency had a duty pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.302(b) to notify complainant about initiating the EEO process,

and the date of filing the MSPB appeal shall be considered the date of

initial EEO Counselor contact in this case. Complainant filed his mixed

case appeal with the MSPB on August 5, 2002. Although complainant filed

his MSPB appeal after receiving the July 25, 2002 job offer, we note

that the same job offer became a permanent reassignment effective August

10, 2002, and thus is considered to have merged with the job offer.

Therefore, as complainant's August 5, 2002 EEO Counselor contact was

within forty-five days of the alleged discriminatory event, we find that

complainant's EEO Counselor contact was timely.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED for further processing

in accordance with the Order listed below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 20, 2004

__________________

Date