Kum S. Slater, Complainant,v.R.L. Brownlee, Acting Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 23, 2003
01a33329_r (E.E.O.C. Jul. 23, 2003)

01a33329_r

07-23-2003

Kum S. Slater, Complainant, v. R.L. Brownlee, Acting Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Kum S. Slater v. Department of the Army

01A33329

July 23, 2003

.

Kum S. Slater,

Complainant,

v.

R.L. Brownlee,

Acting Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A33329

Agency No. ANDMFO0112B0610

DECISION

Complainant, a Bartender, timely appealed the agency's decision not to

reinstate her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination that the

parties had settled. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504. The record indicates that

on March 8, 2002, the parties resolved complainant's complaint by entering

into a settlement agreement, which provided, in pertinent part, that:

3.b. For the period of one year, commencing January 1, 2002, a study

on hours scheduled and hours worked for regular part-time Bartenders

at Rocker II, will be conducted once a quarter. Should there be a

disparity of hours scheduled or worked greater than 10 hours, every

effort will be made to ensure that a disparity of more than 10 hours is

neutralized during the subsequent quarters. The study will be shared

with the regular part-time Bartenders in Rocker II within 30 days of

the quarter close out. As an example, for the period ending March 31,

2002, the study will be shared on or about May 1, 2002.

On February 18, 2003, complainant alleged that the agency failed to

comply with Provision 3.b. of the settlement agreement when she had not

received the year end report. The record indicates that although the

4th and final quarterly report (quarter ending January 22, 2003) was due

complainant by February 21, 2003, it was not issued to complainant by

that time frame. Nevertheless, the record clearly indicates that after

complainant's noncompliance notification, the agency issued her with the

report at issue which was received by complainant on February 26, 2003.

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency substantially complied

with the settlement agreement even though the quarterly report, at issue,

was issued to complainant 5 days late, which was harmless. On appeal,

complainant does not dispute the agency's compliance of three other

previous quarterly reports under the settlement agreement nor does she

raise any new contentions other than filing a notice of appeal.

Accordingly, the agency's decision finding no breach is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 23, 2003

__________________

Date