05a00733
07-17-2000
Kevin Patterson v. United States Postal Service
05A00733
July 17, 2000
Kevin Patterson, )
Complainant, ) Request No. 05A00733
) Appeal No. 01A00725
) Agency No. 1H-321-0056-98
)
William J. Henderson, )
Postmaster General, )
United States Postal Service, )
(S.E./S.W Areas), )
Agency. )
____________________________________)
DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
The complainant initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in Kevin
Patterson v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01A00725
(3/1/00).<1> EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in
its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision where the
requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved
a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2)
the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644,
37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. �
1614.405(b)).
The prior decision found complainant failed to timely file his appeal
of an agency's final decision. Specifically, we found that in order for
complainant's appeal to have been timely filed, he needed to submit his
appeal by October 1, 1999. Since his notice of appeal was postmarked
October 17, 1999, the prior decision dismissed the appeal as untimely.
On appeal, complainant had argued that he had timely filed an appeal,
but neglected to submit the final agency decision. Finding no evidence
to support this argument, the prior decision dismissed the appeal.
In his request for reconsideration, complainant submits a copy of
an envelope addressed to the Office of Federal Operations, postmarked
September 30, 1999. He claims this is the envelope in which he originally
submitted his appeal. As such, he asks us to reopen his case.
After a review of the complainant's request for reconsideration, the
previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the
request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is
the decision of the Commission to deny the request. Complainant failed
to show how the prior decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material law or fact.
The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A00725 remains the Commission's
final decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on
the decision of the Commission on this request for reconsideration.
COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0400)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right
of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the
right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District
Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this
decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN
THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT
HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
July 17, 2000
Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations
1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all
federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative
process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.