Kenneth R. Singleton, Complainant,v.Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 20, 2008
0120082388 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 20, 2008)

0120082388

08-20-2008

Kenneth R. Singleton, Complainant, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.


Kenneth R. Singleton,

Complainant,

v.

Michael J. Astrue,

Commissioner,

Social Security Administration,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120082388

Agency No. DAL061907SSA

Hearing No. 450200700323X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's

appeal from the agency's March 24, 2008 final order concerning his equal

employment opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging employment discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),

as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Complainant alleged that the agency discriminated against him on the

bases of race (African-American) and sex (male) when he was removed from

his position as a GS-7 Claims Representative. Following the agency's

investigation into his complaint, complainant requested a hearing before

an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ). The hearing was held on November

29, 2007. On January 9, 2008, the AJ issued her decision concluding that

the preponderance of the evidence did not establish that discrimination

occurred. The agency adopted the AJ's decision in its final order,

and the instant appeal followed.

Complainant was initially hired under the Federal Career Intern Program

in February 2005 and his appointment was subject to the successful

completion of a two-year training program. By letter dated November 1,

2005, complainant was notified that his excepted service position was

being terminated effective November 11, 2005. The letter was issued by

the District Manager (African American female). The letter stated that

complainant was being terminated for poor work performance. Specifically,

the letter cited to complainant failing to follow instructions and

failing to refer to policy and procedure guidance provided to him.

The termination letter noted that complainant preferred to do things

his way which resulted in unnecessary and potentially harmful/fatal

delays. During their testimony at the hearing, management witnesses

explained the reasoning in the termination letter with further detail

and example. In her decision, the Administrative Judge specifically found

the management witnesses to be credible, and concluded that complainant

failed to show that the agency's articulated reasons for terminating

him were a pretext for discrimination.

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the final agency order because

the Administrative Judge's ultimate finding, that unlawful employment

discrimination was not proven by a preponderance of the evidence, is

supported by substantial evidence of record.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 20, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120082388

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120082388