Kellburn Manufacturing Co., Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 1, 194347 N.L.R.B. 217 (N.L.R.B. 1943) Copy Citation In the Matter of KELLBURN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. and,, HUDSON VALLEY DISTRICT , INTERNATIONAL LADIES' GARMENT WORK- ERS' UNION , A. F. OF L. Case No. R-436.5 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION AND - DIRECTION Febv°uary 1,1943• On November 2, 1942, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, issued its Decision and Direction of Election in this proceeding.' Pursuant to the Direction of Election, an election by secret ballot was conducted on November 19, 1942, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the, Second Region (New York City). On December 3, 1942, the Regional Director, acting pur- suant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, issued and duly served upon the parties his Election Report. On December 8, 1942, the Re- gional Director issued and duly served- upon the parties an amend- ment to'hjs Election Report. As to the balloting and the results the Regional Director reported as follows : Approximate number of eligible voters__________________________________ 131 Total Ballots cast------------------------- - --- --- -------------- ---------------- 103 Total ballots challenged________________________________________________ 40 Total void ballots---------------------------------------------------- 0 Total valid votes counted ---------------------------- ---------------------- 63 Votes cast for Hnd,^ou Valley District,, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union. AFL---------------------------------------------=-- 35 Votes cast against Hudson Valley District, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, AFL------------------------------------------------ -28 On December 7, 1942, Hudson Valley District, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, herein called the Union, filed a "Statement" with respect to the Election Report, stating that in the event the Board followed the recommendations in the Regional Director's December 3 Report in their entirety, it would forego filing objections. It stated, 1 45 N L R B 322 47 N L,R B, No. 21. 217 218 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD however, that in the event the recommendations were not followed or if a hearing were required by reason of objections filed by any other party, it desired to submit evidence in support of its contentions that the ballots of three persons 2 be declared invalid and the ballots of six persons 3 be declared valid. 'ire have considered the "Statement" filed by the Union as objections, as did the Regional Director, and, for the reasons indicated below in connection with the treatment of the va- lidity of the ballots cast by the foregoing persons, find no merit in the objections by the Union. On December 13, 1942, Kellburn Manufacturing Company, Inc., herein called the Company, filed Objections to the Regional Director's Report and Amended Report, in v=hich the Company objected to the conduct of the election and also excepted to certain rulings with re- spect to challenged ballots. On January 4, 1943. the Regional Director issued and duly served upon the parties as "Answer to Objections," finding no merit in the objections filed by either party and reaffirming the recommendations made in his Election, Report, as amended. We shall first consider the general objections of the Company concerning the conduct of the election ; the remaining objections relate to rulings and -recommendations on challenges, and will be considered in con- nection with the discussion of the validity of the challenged ballots. 0 A. The conduct of the election The Company contends that the Board agent in charge of the elec- tion did not permit the Company's observers to challenge persons whom they wished to challenge, and that in consequence six,ineligible persons voted without challenge. It contends, therefore, that the bal- lots of these persons be declared invalid., - Prior to the election, the Company agreed to furnish the Board agent with a list of persons it desired to challenge.. On November 17, 1942, IJie Company sent the agent a letter transmitting "Challenge List and reasons for their challenge." Enclosed with the letter were five lists, xs follows: (1) "Challenge List," listing the names of persons and the place where each was alleged to be working; (2) "Employees at Kell- -burn entitled to vote"; (3) "Those who left employ prior to walk-out"; (4.) "Employees working 2 weeks-oi less"; and (5) "People who left Kellburn' employ after walk-out." On November 18, the Company, itddressed to the Board agent another letter, stating that it desired also to challenge four additional Iiamed persons. The Board agent did not receive this communication prior to leaving the Regional Office to conduct the election on November 19. 2 Betty Newkirk, Pauline Nezich, and Kenneth MacLary. The Regional Director had - recommended that the ballots of these persons be held valid and counted See infra. 3 These persons are discussed in Section B, tinfra. The Regional Director had recommended that their ballots be not counted. KELLBURN -MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. .219 At the election the Board agent ruled that observers, whether for the Union or for the Company, could have before them only lists of persons they intended to challenge. The agent assumed that the only persons the Company desired to challenge were those appearing on the document marked "Challenge List" which he -had received from- the Company. Since he had not received the supplemental list of four Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation