Keith W. French, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 9, 2003
01A31605_r (E.E.O.C. Jul. 9, 2003)

01A31605_r

07-09-2003

Keith W. French, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Keith W. French v. United States Postal Service

01A31605

July 9, 2003

.

Keith W. French,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A31605

Agency No. 1K-221-0052-02

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim. In a complaint dated November 19, 2002, complainant

alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race,

color, age, and reprisal for prior EEO activity when:

On May 31, 2002, management falsely accused complainant of harassing

other employees;

On June 12, 2002, management separated complainant from his crew.

On unspecified dates, management threatened him with disciplinary action;

On an unspecified date, management failed to conduct a thorough

investigation;

On an unspecified date, the EEO Dispute Resolution Specialist violated

complainant's civil rights to due process by delaying complainant's

complaint from August 8, 2002, until November 8, 2002;

On an unspecified date, management did nothing to another employee

accused of the same allegations as complainant; and

On an unspecified date, complainant was accused of harassing the Plant

Manager.

The Commission finds that claims 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, fail to state a claim

under the EEOC regulations because complainant failed to show that he

suffered harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege

of employment for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of

the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Nothing in

the record indicates complainant was subjected to any adverse employment

action, received any disciplinary measure or suffered any loss as a result

of the alleged events. Moreover, the Commission has previously held that

being subject to an internal investigation does not render an individual

aggrieved under the EEOC regulations. See Johnson v. Department of the

Navy, EEOC Request No. 05960699 (April 16, 1998); Mattocks v. Department

of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05950549 (August 29, 1996). Accordingly,

the agency's final decision dismissing claims 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 is proper.

If claim 5 involves the instant complaint, we find that complainant

is not aggrieved by the alleged delay in processing of his EEO matter.

If claim 5 involves the processing of a prior complaint, we find that

such a claim is properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(8).

We therefore AFFIRM the agency's decision dismissing the complaint.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 9, 2003

__________________

Date