Keith Fisher, Complainant,v.Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 7, 2008
0120082651 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 7, 2008)

0120082651

08-07-2008

Keith Fisher, Complainant, v. Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.


Keith Fisher,

Complainant,

v.

Michael B. Mukasey,

Attorney General,

Department of Justice,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120082651

Agency No. P20080141

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated May 7, 2008, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim. In a complaint dated January 18, 2008, complainant

alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on the basis of race

(African-American) when:

1. In September 2007, he was the subject of an Office of Inspector

General (OIG) investigation, and on two dates he had to perform job

assignments that had him in contact with inmates that were involved in

the allegations of staff misconduct;

2. In October 2007 he was subjected to comments from the Lieutenant

who complainant believed initiated the OIG investigation;

3. In November 2007, he was subjected to intimidation when the Captain

stated in a disgusted voice "excuse me" because he could have avoided

complainant;

4. In December 2007 he was subjected to a shakedown while bringing

bingo holiday prizes into the institution.

The Commission has held that an employee cannot use the EEO complaint

process to lodge a collateral attack on another proceeding. See Wills

v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05970596 (July 30, 1998);

Kleinman v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05940585

(September 22, 1994); Lingad v. United States Postal Service, EEOC

Request No. 05930106 (June 25, 1993). The proper forum for complainant

to have raised his challenges to actions related to a potential criminal

proceeding, of which an office of Inspector General (IG) investigation

is a part, is generally within that proceeding itself. Hence, we find

that complainant's claim of harassment as to the IG investigation does

not state a claim.

The Commission finds that the remaining claims fail to state a claim

under the EEOC regulations because complainant failed to show that he

suffered harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege

of employment for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of

the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Moreover,

to the extent complainant is claiming a discriminatory hostile work

environment, we find that the events described, even if proven to be true,

would not indicate that complainant has been subjected to harassment

that was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of his

employment. See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, Request No. 05970077

(March 13, 1997). Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your

time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil

action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph

above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 7, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120082651

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

4

0120082651