01990985_r
09-14-1999
Katherine Wheatfall, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Katherine Wheatfall, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01990985
) Agency No. 1-F-901-0181-98
William J. Henderson, )
Postmaster General, )
United States Postal Service, )
Agency. )
______________________________)
DECISION
On November 12, 1998, appellant filed an appeal with this Commission from
a final agency decision (FAD) dated October 5, 1998, pertaining to her
complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.,
�501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �791 et
seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA),
as amended, 29 U.S.C. �621 et seq.<1> In her complaint, appellant
alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race
(African-American), national origin, sex (female), mental disability
(anxiety and stress), age (date of birth February 17, 1943), and in
reprisal for prior EEO activity when:
Appellant's request for sick leave was not approved and appellant
received sixteen (16) hours of absence without official leave (AWOL); and
Appellant felt humiliated and embarrassed when she was criticized and
shouted at in front of others by her supervisor.
The agency accepted allegation (2), but dismissed allegation (1) pursuant
to EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(e), for being moot. Specifically,
the agency found that interim relief, in the form of appellant's sick
leave being approved and the AWOL rescinded in July 1998, irrevocably
eradicated the effects of the alleged discrimination.
A review of appellant's formal complaint, dated July 13, 1998, reveals
that appellant requested compensatory damages. Further, the Counselor's
Report, dated July 1, 1998, notes that �appellant requested . . . an
unspecified amount of compensatory damages.�
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(e) provides for the dismissal
of a complaint, or portions thereof, when the issues raised therein
are moot. When the agency dismisses an allegation for being moot,
however, the Commission has held that an agency must address the issue
of compensatory damages when a complainant shows objective evidence that
she has incurred compensatory damages, and that the damages are related
to the alleged discrimination. See Routson v. National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, EEOC Request No. 05970388 (March 18, 1999); Jackson
v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01923399 (Nov. 12, 1992),
request to reopen denied, EEOC Request No. 05930306 (Feb. 1, 1993).
Because appellant requested compensatory damages, the agency should have
requested that appellant provide some objective proof of the alleged
damages incurred, as well as objective evidence linking those damages
to the adverse action at issue. See Benton v. Department of Defense,
EEOC Appeal No. 01932422 (Dec. 10, 1993). The Commission finds that
the agency failed to address the issue of compensatory damages in its
FAD. Therefore, the agency's dismissal of allegation (1) was improper.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the agency's dismissal of allegation (1) is REVERSED,
and the allegation is REMANDED for further processing.
ORDER (E1092)
The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegations in accordance
with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant
that it has received the remanded allegations within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to
appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant
of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days
of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise
resolved prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision
without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty
(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy
of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights
must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action.
The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to
the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's
order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of
the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The appellant also has the right
to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's
order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.
See 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503(g). Alternatively,
the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying
complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File
A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for
enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to
the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the
appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the
complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you
have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you
receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some
jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner
suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your
civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN
THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision
or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the
jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,
you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR
DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your
appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME
AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY
HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME
AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.
Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of
your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
Sept. 14, 1999
__________________________________
DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations
1The agency was unable to supply a copy of a certified mail return receipt
or any other material capable of establishing the date appellant received
the agency's final decision. Accordingly, since the agency failed to
submit evidence of the date of receipt, the Commission presumes that
appellant's appeal was filed within thirty (30) days of receipt of the
agency's final decision. See, 29 C.F.R. �1614.402.