Katherine Coleman, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Great Lakes Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 6, 2010
0120101733 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 6, 2010)

0120101733

08-06-2010

Katherine Coleman, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Great Lakes Area), Agency.


Katherine Coleman,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Great Lakes Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120101733

Agency No. 4J-460-0124-09

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's final decision dated February 4, 2010, dismissing her formal complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

BACKGROUND

In a formal complaint dated January 17, 2010, complainant, a SSA and Distribution Clerk at the agency's Munster Post Office in Munster, Indiana claimed that the agency discriminated against her on the bases of race, sex, age, and in reprisal for prior protected activity when:

on various dates beginning on or about August 15, 2009, she was harassed and spoken to in a demeaning manner regarding her job duties and performances and on January 15, 2010, she was called a "big liar."

On February 4, 2010, the Agency issued a final decision. Therein, the Agency dismissed the formal complaint for failure to state a claim, finding that the alleged incidents did not rise to the level of harassment and are not sufficiently severe or pervasive enough to state a claim.

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides in relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim. The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's formal complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a) (1) for failure to state a claim because the alleged events which taken as a whole failed to show that she suffered harm or loss with respect to a term, condition or privilege of her employment. Moreover, we find that the claims, even if proven to be true and viewed in a light most favorable to complainant, would not indicate that complainant has been subjected to harassment that was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment. See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request no. 05970077 (March 13, 1997). Finally, Moreover, the alleged agency actions were not of a type reasonably likely to deter complainant or others from engaging in protected activity.

The Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's formal complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any

supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 6, 2010

__________________

Date

2

0120101733

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120101733