Karen A. Taylor, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 29, 2000
01a02841 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 29, 2000)

01a02841

06-29-2000

Karen A. Taylor, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Karen A. Taylor v. United States Postal Service

01A02841

June 29, 2000

Karen A. Taylor, )

Complainant, )

)

v. )

) Appeal No. 01A02841

William J. Henderson, ) Agency No. 4H-327-0239-98

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

______________________________)

DISMISSAL

On March 3, 2000, complainant, through her attorney, filed an appeal

with this Commission from a final agency decision, dated January 21,

2000, concerning her contention that the agency breached a previous

settlement agreement.<1> By regulation, appeals to the Commission must

be filed within thirty (30) calendar days after a complainant receives

the final agency decision. Appeals are deemed filed on the date received

by the Commission, unless postmarked earlier. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644,

37,661 (1999) (to be codified as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(b)).

In this case, the record indicates that the complainant received the

final agency decision on January 22, 2000.<2> Complainant's appeal on

March 3, 2000 was, therefore, beyond the thirty (30) day time limit set

by the Regulations. A review of the final agency decision indicates

that complainant was provided with appeal rights to the Commission.

On appeal, complainant's attorney indicated that he had "recently"

been retained by the complainant.<3> He also indicated that, initially,

a mediation session had been scheduled with the agency, on February 16,

2000, concerning complainant's subsequent removal. The attorney stated

that "[i]t was thought that the mediation, if successful, would give the

complainant substantial relief which would eliminate the necessity of

this appeal." The mediation session had to be rescheduled for March 2,

2000, and was subsequently canceled when complainant could not attend,

due to her son's illness. According to the attorney, these facts,

along with the large number of federal court cases he was involved in,

are extenuating circumstances that should justify an extension of time

to file the appeal. We disagree. Complainant has not presented an

adequate justification for extending or waiving the appeal filing period.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

06-29-00 _____________________________

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_____________________ _________________________________

DATE

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.

2The record contains a copy of a certified mail return receipt that

shows that the final agency decision was received at her home on January

22, 2000.

3The letter clearly establishes that complainant was not represented by

the attorney at the time the final decision was issued; therefore, the

time limitation period properly began upon her receipt of the decision.