June A. Nickerson, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 10, 2004
01a42446 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 10, 2004)

01a42446

06-10-2004

June A. Nickerson, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


June A. Nickerson v. United States Postal Service

01A42446

June 10, 2004

.

June A. Nickerson,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A42446

Agency No. 4C-440-0049-04

DECISION

On December 15, 2003, complainant filed a formal EEO complaint wherein

she claimed that she was discriminated against on the bases of her

disability and in reprisal for her previous EEO activity under the

Rehabilitation Act when:

On November 18, 2003, and on an ongoing basis, management directed the

removal of all of her work assignments.

On November 12, 2003, and on an ongoing basis, she was required to

recertify her Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) medical condition in

violation of the FMLA.

By agency decision dated February 13, 2004, the agency dismissed claims

(1) and (2) of the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1), on

the grounds of failure to state a claim, and claim (2) also pursuant to 29

C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1), on the grounds that it states the same claim that

is pending before or has been decided by the agency or the Commission.

The agency determined with regard to claim (1) that complainant provided

no explanation about how management has directed the removal of her work

assignments. As for claim (2), the agency determined that complainant did

not claim any personal loss related to a term, condition, or privilege

of her employment. The agency also determined that the same matter was

raised in a prior complaint filed by complainant. The agency stated

that the prior complaint was investigated and a final action was issued

with a finding of no discrimination. Thereafter, complainant filed the

instant appeal.

As for the agency's dismissal of claim (1) on the grounds of failure to

state a claim, we find that complainant has stated a claim. According

to the EEO Counselor's report, complainant claims that her supervisor

has removed her work assignments and will not allow her to perform

duties with any responsibilities. Complainant's claim that her work

assignments have been removed concerns a term, condition, or privilege

of her employment. Accordingly, the agency's decision that claim (1)

failed to state a claim was improper and is hereby REVERSED.

As for claim (2), we find that requiring complainant to recertify her

medical condition under the FMLA did not cause complainant to suffer

personal harm to a term, condition, or privilege of her employment.

Complainant does not argue that the November 12, 2003 requirement to

recertify her medical condition resulted in a denial of FMLA leave.

Thus, the Commission finds that claim (2) fails to state a claim.<1>

The agency's dismissal of claim (1) is REVERSED and we REMAND claim

(1) for further processing in accordance with this decision and the

Order herein. The agency's dismissal of claim (2) is AFFIRMED.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claim in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claim within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

June 10, 2004

__________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1In light of our affirmance of the agency's dismissal of claim (2)

on the grounds of failure to state a claim, we need not address the

agency's alternative grounds for dismissal.