Julie A. Marsh, Complainant,v.Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, (Transportation Security Administration), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 14, 2011
0520110128 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 14, 2011)

0520110128

04-14-2011

Julie A. Marsh, Complainant, v. Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, (Transportation Security Administration), Agency.




Julie A. Marsh,

Complainant,

v.

Janet Napolitano,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security,

(Transportation Security Administration),

Agency.

Request No. 0520110128

Appeal No. 0120102912

Hearing No. 570-2009-00068X

Agency No. HS-08-TSA-001984

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Julie

A. Marsh v. Department of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. 0120102912

(September 30, 2010). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may,

in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission

decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact

or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on

the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. §

1614.405(b).

In its previous decision, the Commission upheld the decision of the

Administrative Judge finding that Complainant had not established

that the Agency discriminated against her based on sex (female) and

in reprisal for prior protected EEO activity with regard to negative

comments included in her 2007 performance evaluation, under either the

disparate treatment or harassment theories of discrimination.

In her request to reopen, Complainant reiterates arguments raised below,

contending that her performance was not, in fact deficient in the manner

described, and that the Agency “manufactured” the security breach

referenced in the proceedings below.

We note that a request for reconsideration is not a second form

of appeal. E.g., Lopez v. Department of Agriculture, EEOC Request

No. 0520070736 (August 20, 2007). Complainant’s request establishes

neither that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law, nor that the appellate decision

will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations

of the agency.

After reconsidering the previous decision and the entire record,

the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of

29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to

DENY the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120102912 remains

the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative

appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

“Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and

not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the

request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as

stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 14, 2011

Date

2

0520110128

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0520110128