01a51492
03-15-2005
Judy Hong, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Judy Hong v. United States Postal Service
01A51492
03-15-05
.
Judy Hong,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A51492
Agency No. 4F-913-0154-04
DECISION
Judy Hong (complainant) filed an appeal from the November 9, 2004, final
decision of the United States Postal Service (agency) dismissing the
above-referenced complaint. The appeal is timely filed (see 29 C.F.R. �
1614.402(a)) and is accepted in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.
In a formal complaint, complainant claimed discrimination based on
reprisal when her supervisor screamed at her and watched her closely on
June 1, 2004. Complainant contacted an EEO counselor on July 21, 2004.
In its final decision, the agency dismissed the complaint for untimely
EEO contact and failure to state a claim.
The Commission's regulations require an agency to dismiss a complaint with
regard to events that occurred more than 45 days prior to complainant's
initial contact with an EEO counselor. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.107(a)(2).
We find that complainant failed to contact an EEO counselor in a
timely manner. The Commission's regulations also require an agency to
dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim within the meaning of
29 C.F.R. �1614.103. The Commission's federal sector case precedent
defines an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or
loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment
for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force,
EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). We find that the event
was not sufficiently egregious in nature or pervasive to constitute
illegal harassment. In addition, complainant did not elaborate on her
basis of reprisal.
After a review of the record, including statements and arguments not
addressed herein, and for the reasons stated above, we find that the
agency properly dismissed the complaint.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the agency's decision was proper and is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
_____03-15-05_____________
Date