Joyce Hazelwood, Complainant,v.Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Finance & Accounting Service), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 13, 2002
01A14133_r (E.E.O.C. Aug. 13, 2002)

01A14133_r

08-13-2002

Joyce Hazelwood, Complainant, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Defense Finance & Accounting Service), Agency.


Joyce Hazelwood v. Department of Defense

01A14133

August 13, 2002

.

Joyce Hazelwood,

Complainant,

v.

Donald H. Rumsfeld,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

(Defense Finance & Accounting Service),

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A14133

Agency No. DFAS-DE-SANB-01-015

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the complaint was improperly

dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state

a claim and pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) on the grounds of

untimely EEO Counselor contact

On February 21, 2001, complainant initiated EEO Counselor contact,

claiming that she had been discriminated against on the bases of race,

sex, age, disability, and in reprisal for prior protected activity when,

between the period of January 1997 and March 5, 2001, notifications of

personnel action forms (SF 50) incorrectly reflected her educational

level as �04" instead of �14" in spite of extensive documentation in

her records supporting a code �14.� Subsequently, complainant filed

a formal complaint concerning this issue. Complainant further claimed

that on January 14, 2001, she became aware for the first time that the

number �04" denoted an educational level that was equivalent to a high

school graduate. Complainant claimed that due to this error, she has

been continuously denied promotions and advancement opportunities.

The agency issued a final decision dismissing the complaint for untimely

EEO Counselor contact and for failure to state a claim.

The only proper questions in determining whether a claim is within

the purview of the EEO process are (1) whether the complainant is

an aggrieved employee and (2) whether she has alleged employment

discrimination covered by the EEO statutes. An employee is "aggrieved"

if he has suffered direct and personal deprivation at the hands of the

employer. See Hobson v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05891133

(March 2, 1990). Here, complainant alleged that the agency improperly

coded a personnel action form, incorrectly reflecting her education code,

thereby causing her denied promotions and advancement opportunities.

Complainant's claim is sufficient to render her an aggrieved employee.

Because complainant has alleged that the adverse action was based on

sex, age, disability, and in reprisal for prior protected activity,

she has raised a claim within the purview of the EEOC regulations.

We also reject the agency's alternative grounds of dismissal for untimely

EEO Counselor contact. Complainant claimed that she initially became

aware on January 14, 2001, that the �04" code denoted an educational

level that was equivalent to a high school graduate. We are persuaded

by complainant's assertions, and find that her initial EEO Counselor

contact of February 21, 2001, was timely with regard to the matters

raised in the instant complaint.

The agency's dismissal of the instant complaint is therefore REVERSED.

Complainant's complaint is REMANDED to the agency for further processing

in accordance with the ORDER below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 13, 2002

__________________

Date