Joseph Snyder, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 29, 2001
01A01408 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 29, 2001)

01A01408

03-29-2001

Joseph Snyder, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Joseph Snyder v. United States Postal Service

01A01408

March 29, 2001

.

Joseph Snyder,

Complainant,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A01408

Agency No. 1-C-191-0110-99

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an

agency's decision dated October 19, 1999, dismissing his complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

791 et seq. In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected

to discrimination on the bases of disability and in reprisal for prior

EEO activity when he learned on or about March 19, 1999, that instead

of two complaints being withdrawn as a result of a grievance settlement,

seven of his EEO complaints were closed without his consent.

The agency dismissed complainant's complaint pursuant to EEOC Regulation

29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(5), because it was moot. Specifically, the agency

determined that as a result of a Pre-Arbitration Grievance Settlement,

complainant had agreed that all pending grievances, EEO complaints,

and MSPB appeals were resolved (�for these issues�) by the settlement,

making his complaint moot.

Upon review of the record, we find that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed. The record shows that of the five complaints

at issue, two were properly closed under the grievance settlement and

three were separately dismissed on other grounds and are presently on

appeal to be reviewed by the Commission.<1> On January 7, 1998, the

parties reached a grievance settlement that resolved all �grievances,

EEO complaints and MSPB appeals� related to complainant's Notice of

Removal/7 day suspension<2> and his reassignment as a Tractor Trailer

Operator. The record indicates that the issues in two of the disputed

complaints involve not assigning complainant to a Tractor Trailer

Operator position in March and April 1997 (Agency Nos. 4C-190-0152-97,

4C-190-0049-98). As such, we find that these complaints have been

settled by the grievance settlement and properly closed by the agency.

Additionally, the record also shows that instead of being closed as

part of the grievance settlement, three of the five EEO complaints

that concern complainant were dismissed by the agency on June 21, 1999,

and were then separately appealed by complainant to the Commission on

July 20, 1999, prior to the September 28, 1999 formal complaint in the

instant appeal. Therefore, the portion of the complaint pertaining to

these three previously dismissed complaints was appropriately dismissed.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth herein.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 29, 2001

__________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1Agency Nos. 4C-190-0140-97 (EEOC Appeal No.01995929), 4C-190-0185-97

(EEOC Appeal No.01995931), and 4C-190-0231-97 (EEOC Appeal No.01995930).

2Complainant agrees that the two complaints concerning his Notice of

Removal/7 day suspension were properly closed.