Joseph Pastures, Petitioner,v.1 John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 13, 2008
0320080055 (E.E.O.C. May. 13, 2008)

0320080055

05-13-2008

Joseph Pastures, Petitioner, v. 1 John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Joseph Pastures,

Petitioner,

v. 1

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Petition No. 0320080055

MSPB No. AT07252070596I1

DECISION

Petitioner filed a timely petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission asking for review of a Final Order issued by the Merit

Systems Protection Board (MSPB) concerning his claim of discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),

as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section 501 of the Rehabilitation

Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.,

and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

Petitioner alleged that he was discriminated against on the bases of race

(African-American), sex (male), disability (diverticulitis), and age (51)

when he was removed from his Mail Handler position for falsification in

recording time. Briefly, petitioner was accused of being paid overtime

for hours he did not work and for clocking in another employee before

the start of her tour. In addition, he clocked another employee out

after she left the facility.

Petitioner filed a mixed case complaint and the agency issued a

decision finding that petitioner was not discriminated against as

alleged. Thereafter petitioner filed an appeal with the MSPB and

waived his right to a hearing. An MSPB AJ issued a decision finding

that petitioner was not discriminated against as alleged, and upheld

the removal action. Petitioner sought review by the full Board which

denied his petition. Petitioner then filed the instant petition with

the Commission.

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission has jurisdiction over

mixed case complaints on which the MSPB has issued a decision that

makes determinations on allegations of discrimination. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.303 et seq. The Commission must determine whether the decision of

the MSPB with respect to the allegation of discrimination constitutes a

correct interpretation of any applicable law, rule, regulation or policy

directive, and is supported by the evidence in the record as a whole.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.305(c).

Based upon a thorough review of the record, it is the decision of

the Commission to concur with the final decision of the MSPB finding

no discrimination. The Commission finds that the MSPB's decision

constitutes a correct interpretation of the laws, rules, regulations,

and policies governing this matter and is supported by the evidence in

the record as a whole.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0408)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your

time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil

action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph

above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 13, 2008

__________________

Date

1 The Commission assumes, for purposes of this decision, that petitioner

is a person with a disability. 29 C.F.R. � 1630.2(g).

??

??

??

??

2

0320080055

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0320080055