05A30748
05-29-2003
Jose M. Bejar v. Department of Veterans Affairs
05A30748
May 29, 2003
.
Jose M. Bejar,
Complainant,
v.
Anthony J. Principi,
Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
Agency.
Request No. 05A30748
Appeal No. 01A23016
Agency No. 200M-1499
DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Jose M. Bejar (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider
the decision in Jose M. Bejar v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC
Appeal No. 01A23016 (April 16, 2003). EEOC Regulations provide that the
Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission
decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate
decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact
or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on
the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �
1614.405(b).
In the underlying complaint, complainant alleged that he was discriminated
against on the basis of national origin (Hispanic) and in reprisal for
prior EEO activity when the agency required him to complete reappointment
forms rather than re-privileging forms. When complainant failed to elect
between either a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge or a decision
issued by the agency within the required time period, the agency issued
a final decision finding no discrimination. On appeal to the Commission,
we affirmed the final agency decision's finding of no discrimination.
We remind complainant that a �request for reconsideration is not a second
appeal to the Commission.� Equal Employment Opportunity Management
Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (rev. Nov. 9, 1999), at 9-17.
This Commission carefully considered all of the record evidence at the
time it rendered the initial decision in question, and complainant has
offered no persuasive reason why this decision should be reconsidered now.
After a review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the previous
decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request
fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the
decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC
Appeal No. 01A23016 remains the Commission's final decision. There is no
further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission
on this request for reconsideration.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right
of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the
right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District
Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this
decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in
the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department
head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
May 29, 2003
__________________
Date