Joi C. Brown, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 13, 2010
0120093319 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 13, 2010)

0120093319

01-13-2010

Joi C. Brown, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Joi C. Brown,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120093319

Agency No. 4K270005909

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated July 6, 2009, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

In her complaint, complainant alleged that she was subjected to

discrimination on the bases of race (African American) and sex (female)

resulting in a hostile work environment when:

1) Effective February 19, 2009, complainant was placed on Emergency

Placement in Off-Duty Status;

2) on February 24, 2009 complainant was issued a fourteen day suspension;

and

3) on unspecified dates complainant has been subjected to unfavorable

scheduling, and made to work under higher standards than otherwise

similarly situated coworkers.

The agency dismissed claims 1 and 3 for failure to state a claim, finding

that complainant incurred no harm from the actions because the Emergency

Placement was rescinded and the remaining actions were "common workplace

occurrences." The agency further found that the alleged actions were

insufficiently severe to state a claim of hostile work environment.

Finally, the agency found that all three claims should be dismissed

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) and 106(a) for untimely filing

of the Formal Complaint. The instant appeal followed.

Regarding the timeliness issue, we find that complainant's Formal

Complaint was timely filed. The agency has shown that complainant

received the Right to File notice on May 26, 2009. She therefore had

until June 10, 2009 to file her Formal Complaint. The Formal Complaint

itself is dated June 6, 2009 and the agency date-stamp indicates that it

was received by the agency on June 15, 2009. However, "a document shall

be deemed timely if it is received or postmarked before the expiration of

the applicable filing period, or, in the absence of a legible postmark,

if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the

applicable filing period." 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(b). The envelope

mailed by complainant to the agency does not contain a legible postmark.

Since the agency's date stamp indicates it was received on June 15,

which is within five days of June 10, the expiration date of the filing

period, we find that the Formal Complaint was timely filed.

In further dismissing claims 1 and 3 for failure to state a claim, we

find that the agency improperly considered complainant's allegations

in piece-meal fashion, rather than as evidentiary examples of a single

claim of discriminatory harassment sufficient to establish a hostile

work environment. Therefore, the claim must be assessed based on the

cumulative effect of the alleged actions on the part of the agency.

In this case, we conclude that complainant has made sufficient allegations

to state a viable claim of discriminatory harassment that requires further

processing.1 We also note that the agency has asserted that complainant

has not presented sufficient information to show she incurred any harm

or loss when she was allegedly subjected to unfavorable work scheduling

and made to work under higher standards than her coworkers. However,

the Commission finds that, in reaching this conclusion, the agency

has addressed the merits of complainant's complaint without a proper

investigation as required by the regulations. See Osborne v. Department

of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05960111 (July 19, 1996); Lee v. United

States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05930220 (August 12, 1993);

Ferrazzoli v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05910642

(August 15, 1991).

Accordingly, the dismissal of this complaint is REVERSED and it is

REMANDED to the agency for further processing.

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with 29

C.F.R. � 1614.108 et seq. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1208)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington,

DC 20013. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation,

and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the complainant.

If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil

Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 13, 2010

__________________

Date

1 In addition, she has a separate claim of disparate treatment regarding

the suspension that, if proven, might entitle her to additional equitable

relief.

??

??

??

??

2

0120093319

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

5

0120093319