01A42118_r
07-21-2004
John P. Norton, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
John P. Norton v. United States Postal Service
01A42118
July 21, 2004
.
John P. Norton,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A42118
Agency No. 4A-100-0065-03
DECISION
Complainant appeals to the Commission from the agency's January 12, 2004
decision dismissing his complaint. Complainant alleges discrimination on
the bases of race, color, sex, and age when: (1) on December 5, 2002, he
received a Letter of Warning (LOW); (2) on March 4, 2003, he was notified
that he was going to be transferred; and (3) on an unspecified date,
he was subjected to inappropriate comments by his manager. The agency
dismissed claims 1 and 3 for untimely EEO Counselor contact pursuant
to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2). The agency dismissed claims 2 and 3 for
failure to state a claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).
With regard to claim 1, the agency found that complainant's February
19, 2003 EEO Counselor contact was beyond the 45-day limitation period.
Although complainant received the LOW on December 5, 2002, he argues he
did not reasonably suspect discrimination until January 29, 2003 when
he learned that he was �the only MCSO to receive corrective action for
utilization of craft employees on higher level coverage despite the
fact that four (4) other [MCSOs] . . . were not disciplined . . . for
the same alleged offense.� We find that complainant should not have
reasonably suspected discrimination before January 29, 2003, thus making
his February 19, 2003 EEO Counselor contact timely.
The agency dismissed claim 2 for failure to state a claim. The agency
argues that there is no evidence that complainant was transferred on
March 4, 2003. Complainant concurs that there is no written evidence
of a transfer. However, complainant argues that �[Mr. X] verbally gave
[him] the instructions and [he] followed the instruction of [his] manager
under protest� and was detailed to Grand Central Station. The Commission
finds that the question of whether complainant was actually transferred
is, under the instant circumstances, best answered after an investigation
and a hearing if requested. The Commission finds that the record contains
sufficient information to indicate that complainant may have been detailed
as alleged. Therefore, we find that complainant has shown harm to a term,
condition or privilege of employment and thus, states a claim.
With regard to claim 3, we find that complainant's claim is not severe or
pervasive enough to constitute a claim of harassment even when considered
with the other claims in the complaint. Further, complainant has not
shown harm to a term, condition or privilege of employment and thus,
fails to state a claim. Since claim 3 is properly dismissed for failure
to state a claim, we will not make a determination on the agency's
alternative grounds for dismissal.
The agency's decision dismissing claim 3 is AFFIRMED. The agency's
decision dismissing claims 1 and 2 is REVERSED and we REMAND claims
1 and 2 to the agency in accordance with this decision and applicable
regulations.
ORDER (E0900)
The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with
29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant
that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue
to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify
complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)
calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter
is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a
final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision
within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The
report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to
the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's
order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement
of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the
right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's
order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.
See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).
Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on
the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled
"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.
A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying
complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)
(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the
administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for
enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)
This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it
also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a
portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in
an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar
days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion
of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion
of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative
processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after
one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your
complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until
such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.
If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the
complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,
identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file
a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
July 21, 2004
__________________
Date