John Mayo, Complainant,v.Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 15, 2002
01A15114_r (E.E.O.C. Apr. 15, 2002)

01A15114_r

04-15-2002

John Mayo, Complainant, v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


John Mayo v. Department of Veterans Affairs

01A15114

April 15, 2002

.

John Mayo,

Complainant,

v.

Anthony J. Principi,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A15114

Agency No. 99-5400

Hearing No. 150-A1-8203X

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

improperly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4).

In a complaint dated September 8, 1999, complainant alleged that he

was discriminated against on the of race, sex and in reprisal for prior

EEO activity, when:

On or about June 15, 1999, complainant was detailed to the position

of Cook (Ingredient Control), a lower graded position which included

tasks outside of his current position description.

Complainant received a letter of proposed admonishment and, subsequently,

a Letter of Admonishment on or about July 2, 1999, regarding an incident

that occurred May 11, 1999.

After the complaint was accepted for investigation, complainant requested

a hearing before an Administrative Judge (AJ) of the Commission. In a

decision dated July 17, 2001, the AJ dismissed both claims on the grounds

that complainant had previously filed a grievance with the Federal Labor

Relations Authority (FLRA) concerning the exact same claims. The AJ

found that the agency was subject to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 7121 (d),

and that the agency's collective bargaining agreement (CBA) provides

for claims of discrimination to be raised in the negotiated grievance

process. According to the AJ, "There is no dispute that Complainant

filed a grievance on the aforesaid issues prior to filing his EEO

Complaint.� In a footnote, the AJ noted that complainant had answered

agency interrogatories concerning the details of his EEO complaint,

by referring to an attached copy of his FLRA charge. Consequently,

the AJ dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R.� 1614.301(a),

29 C.F.R.�1614.107(a)(4) and 29 C.F.R. �1614.109(b).

In its final action dated July 30, 2001, the agency implemented the

AJ's decision.

On appeal, complainant argues that his July 19, 1999 FLRA �Charge Against

An Agency,� was a charge of an unfair labor practice filed with the

Department of Labor, and not a union-initiated grievance or complaint

filed pursuant to a negotiated grievance process, as contemplated by

the collective bargaining agreement cited by the agency.

An employee who is subject to 5 U.S.C. � 7121 (d) may raise a claim of

prohibited discrimination under either the EEO complaint process or a

negotiated grievance procedure that allows such claims, but not both. 29

C.F.R. � 1614.301. The employee must elect the forum in which to pursue

the matter. When the grievance is filed first under a negotiated grievance

procedure that permits allegation of discrimination to be raised, the

individual may not subsequently file a complaint of discrimination on

the same matter. The agency must dismiss such a complaint. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(4).

The record confirms that on July 19, 1999, complainant filed through

the Federal Labor Relations Authority, a �Charge Against An Agency� also

called a charge of unfair labor practices (ULP), in violation of 5 USC

Section 7116(a) subsections (1), (2), and (4), regarding complainant's

receipt of a proposed (and subsequently issued), �Letter of Admonishment�

which actions he claims were in retaliation for his having previously

filed other charges and EEO complaints against the agency.

The record contains a copy of a portion of the �Master Agreement Between

the Veterans Administration and the American Federation of Government

Employees.� This document is a collective bargaining agreement (CBA)

between the agency and the union, under which complainant's position is

covered, which provides a negotiated grievance procedure available to

covered employees.

The CBA specifically provides that a complainant must elect to pursue

a claim through the EEO process or the negotiated grievance process in

place at the agency. Specifically, the CBA states that:

"A. As provided for in 5 USC Section 7121, the following actions may be

filed either under the statutory procedure or the negotiated grievance

procedure, but not both:

Actions based on unsatisfactory performance (5 USC Section 4303).

Adverse actions (5 USC Section 7512). and/or

Discrimination (5 USC Section 2302(b)(1)).

...

C. An employee shall be deemed to have exercised her option under this

Section when she timely initiates an action under the applicable statutory

procedure or files a timely grievance in writing under the negotiated

grievance procedure, whichever occurs first. ...

The above referenced CBA does not specifically discuss the ULP process.

We therefore determine that complainant has not �filed a grievance

pursuant to a negotiated grievance procedure� that would otherwise

prohibit his filing an EEO complaint on the same matters. See, e.g.,

Cobian V. Department of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. 01991259 (August

22, 2001). We note, moreover, that while the matter addressed in

claim 2 (Letter of Admonishment) was raised in the ULP process,

the matter addressed in claim 1 (detail to a Cook position) was not

raised therein. Accordingly, we REVERSE the agency's final action to

dismiss the complaint. The complaint is hereby REMANDED to the agency

for processing in accordance with the ORDER below.

ORDER

The agency shall submit to the Hearings Unit of the EEOC Miami District

Office a request for a hearing within fifteen (15) calendar days of

the date this decision becomes final. The agency is directed to submit

a copy of the complaint file to the EEOC Hearings Unit within fifteen

(15) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency

shall provide written notification to the Compliance Officer at the

address set forth below that the request and complaint file have been

transmitted to the Hearings Unit.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

_____________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 15, 2002

__________________

Date