John E. Daniels, Jr., Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 27, 2002
01A22007_r (E.E.O.C. Jun. 27, 2002)

01A22007_r

06-27-2002

John E. Daniels, Jr., Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


John E. Daniels, Jr. v. United States Postal Service

01A22007

June 27, 2002

.

John E. Daniels, Jr.,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A22007

Agency No. 1K-201-0004-02

DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

On February 27, 2002, complainant filed an appeal with this Commission

from the January 17, 2002 final agency decision dismissing his EEO

complaint of unlawful employment discrimination.

A copy of a Domestic Return Receipt card reveals that the final agency

decision was received at complainant's address of record on January

24, 2002. A review of the agency decision reveals that the agency

properly advised complainant that he had thirty (30) calendar days

after receipt of its decision to file his appeal with the Commission.

Therefore, in order to be considered timely, complainant had to file

his appeal no later than February 25, 2002.<1>

On appeal, complainant's attorney asserts that the appeal is timely

filed, because it was filed within thirty days of when he was retained by

complainant and received a copy of the decision. The record indicates,

however, that complainant did not have an attorney at the time that the

agency decision was issued. Therefore, the agency sent the decision to

complainant and the time limit began to run from the time of complainant's

receipt. See 29 C.F.R. 1614.402(b).

The Commission finds that complainant has not offered adequate

justification for an extension of the applicable time limit for filing

his appeal. Accordingly, complainant's appeal is hereby dismissed.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.403(c).

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

June 27, 2002

__________________

Date

1The time limit expired on February 23, 2002; however, since that day

was a Saturday, the time limitation was extended to include the next

business day. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(d).