01994398
11-08-1999
John D. Gonzales, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
John D. Gonzales v. United States Postal Service
01994398
November 8, 1999
John D. Gonzales, )
Appellant, )
)
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01994398
) Agency No. 1G784000399
William J. Henderson, )
Postmaster General, )
United States Postal Service, )
Agency. )
______________________________)
DECISION
INTRODUCTION
Appellant filed an appeal with this Commission from a final agency
decision ("FAD") concerning his complaint of unlawful employment
discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq. The final agency decision was dated
April 2, 1999. The appeal was received May 10, 1999. Accordingly,
we presume the appeal is timely (see, 29 C.F.R. �1614.402(a)), and is
accepted in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960, as amended. The FAD
accepted one of the appellant's contentions for investigation and
dismissed two others.
ISSUE PRESENTED
The issue on appeal is whether the agency erred when it dismissed two of
the appellant's contentions. The dismissed contentions are as follows:
1. The appellant alleged discrimination when on November 18, 1998 he
was informed that a letter of decision was being issued at the close of
business without giving him three extra days.
2. The appellant alleged discrimination when on October 28, 1998 he was
called into the Labor Relations office and informed that he was being
investigated concerning an incident on August 20, 1998 in which he was
seen at the main post office when he had called in sick that day.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
On April 2, 1999, the agency issued a final decision dismissing
appellant's complaint. Specifically, we will consider the agency's
dismissal with regard to appellant's first allegation that he was denied
three extra days after being informed of a forthcoming letter of decision.
Agency argues that appellant was in fact given more than three extra days
in that the letter of decision was not issued until December 12, 1998.
Furthermore, the agency argues that this allegation was raised in
another complaint filed on December 12, 1998 under agency case number
1-G-784-0012-98. Accordingly, the agency dismissed this allegation as
identical to an allegation already pending.
The agency has not included any reliable evidence of complaint number
1-G-784-0012-98. We have no evidence of the existence, scope, or
disposition of that complaint. In Ericson v. Department of the Army,
EEOC Request No. 05920623 (January 14, 1993), the Commission stated that
the agency has the burden of providing evidence and/or proof to support
its final decisions. See Gens v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request
No. 05910837 (January 31, 1992). Therefore we REVERSE the dismissal of
allegation one (above) and remand it for the agency to provide evidence.
Turning now to the appellant's second dismissed allegation, that he
was investigated for being seen at the main post office after calling
in sick. The agency dismissed this allegation after the investigation
reveled that no action was in fact taken against the appellant.
The Commission's Federal sector case precedent has long defined an
"aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with
respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which
there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request
No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).
In allegation two, appellant alleges that he was investigated for
being seen at the post office on a day that he called in sick. We find
that appellant has not alleged a personal loss or harm regarding a
term, condition or privilege of employment as a result of the alleged
incident. Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss allegation two
(above) for failure to state a claim was proper and is AFFIRMED.
ORDER (E1092)
The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegations in accordance
with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant
that it has received the remanded allegations within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to
appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant
of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days
of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise
resolved prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision
without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty
(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to appellant and a copy
of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights
must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action.
The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to
the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's
order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of
the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The appellant also has the right
to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's
order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.
See 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503(g). Alternatively,
the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying
complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File
A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for
enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to
the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the
appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the
complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0993)
This decision affirms the agency's final decision in part, but it also
requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a
portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action
in an appropriate United States District Court on both that portion of
your complaint which the Commission has affirmed AND that portion of the
complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative processing.
It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file
a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN
NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.
You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have
interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that
a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the
date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action
is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)
CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult
an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction
in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT
IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT
HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file
a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
11/08/1999 ____________________________
DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations