John A. Johnson, Complainant,v.Mary E. Peters, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 5, 2008
0120080650 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 5, 2008)

0120080650

03-05-2008

John A. Johnson, Complainant, v. Mary E. Peters, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.


John A. Johnson,

Complainant,

v.

Mary E. Peters,

Secretary,

Department of Transportation,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120080650

Agency No. 200721434FAA03

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

agency's decision dated October 17, 2007, dismissing his complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

791 et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds

that complainant's complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact.

In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to

discrimination on the bases of disability (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder)

and age (D.O.B. 04/07/58) when after being denied leave without pay under

the Family Medical Leave Act on July 23, 2004, he was forced to resign

from his position of Senior Technical Advisor effective August 9, 2004.

The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event occurred

on August 9, 2004, but complainant did not initiate contact with an

EEO Counselor until June 29, 2007, which is beyond the forty-five

(45) day limitation period. On appeal, complainant has presented no

persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an extension of the time

limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact. On appeal complainant

has asserted that his first EEO contact was actually June 30, 2006,

not June 29, 2007. However, even if that were true, complainant's EEO

counselor contact is untimely. In addition, the Commission notes that

the record contains copies of letters from complainant to the agency

raising claims of discrimination concerning the instant matters. In a

letter dated August 18, 2006, complainant was given the telephone number

for contacting an EEO counselor, but complainant appeared reluctant

to utilize the information as noted in his letter of June 18, 2007,

where he stated "Please allow me to emphasize I will not be contacting

the national intake unit regarding my discrimination complaint."

We find, that complainant has failed to present any argument to justify an

extension of the applicable time limit for almost 2 years. See Baldwin

County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984) (per curiam)

("One who fails to act diligently cannot invoke equitable principles

to excuse lack of diligence"); Rys v. United States Postal Service,

886 F.2d 443, 446 (1st Cir. 1989) ("to find succor in equity a Title

VII plaintiff must have diligently pursued her claim"). Accordingly, the

agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 5, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120080650

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120080650