Joe E. Williams, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 11, 2005
01a45990 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 11, 2005)

01a45990

08-11-2005

Joe E. Williams, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Joe E. Williams v. United States Postal Service

01A45990

08-11-05

.

Joe E. Williams,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A45990

Agency No. 4C-290-0045-03

Hearing No. 140-2004-00104X

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's

appeal from the agency's final order in the above-entitled

matter. Complainant alleged that the agency discriminated against him

on the bases of race (Black) and reprisal for prior EEO activity when:

(1) on November 27, 2002, his supervisor spoke to him in a hostile,

abusive, and unprofessional manner; (2) he was denied a verbal

request to work out-of-schedule for a doctor's appointment; and (3)

he was denied overtime. After a review of the record in its entirety,

including consideration of all statements submitted on appeal, it is

the decision of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm

the agency's final order, because the Administrative Judge's issuance

of a decision without a hearing was appropriate and a preponderance of

the record evidence does not establish that discrimination occurred.<1>

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

____08-11-05______________

Date

1On appeal, complainant's attorney indicated that the agency failed to

provide her with a copy of its motion for summary judgment. The agency,

in response, maintained that the reason was due to the failure of

complainant's attorney to note her appearance in the case as required

by the Administrative Judge's Acknowledgment Order. We do not find

the agency's explanation to be persuasive. As noted by complainant's

attorney, she attended and participated in the deposition in this

case. Her name and address also appear at page 2 of the deposition.

Notwithstanding the above, we do not find that the decisions of the

Administrative Judge and the agency should be set aside. First, we

note that there is no dispute that complainant was mailed a copy of

the agency's motion and could have provided it to his attorney. We also

note that, on appeal, complainant's attorney failed identify any genuine

issue of material fact that would preclude granting summary judgment in

this case.