Jimmie Capers, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 29, 2002
01a02696 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 29, 2002)

01a02696

08-29-2002

Jimmie Capers, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Jimmie Capers v. United States Postal Service

01A02696

08-29-02

.

Jimmie Capers,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A02696

Agency No. 1A-111-0042-99

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts the complainant's

appeal from the agency's final decision in the above-entitled matter.

Complainant claimed discrimination based on race/national origin (black)

and disability (learning-disabled) when he was removed (later reduced

by the agency to a four-month suspension) from his position in December

1998, for falsification of his application.<1> The Commission finds that,

while the agency properly applied the three-pronged disparate treatment

analysis of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, infra, it erred in finding

that complainant was not adversely affected by the agency's action.

Claims of disparate treatment are examined under the tripartite analysis

first enunciated in McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Green, 411 U.S. 792

(1973). For complainant to prevail, he must first establish a prima

facie case of discrimination by presenting facts that, if unexplained,

reasonably give rise to an inference of discrimination, i.e., that a

prohibited consideration was a factor in the adverse employment action.

McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 802; Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters,

438 U.S. 567 (1978).<2> Once a complainant has established a prima facie

case, the burden then shifts to the agency to articulate a legitimate,

nondiscriminatory reason for its actions. Texas Department of Community

Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 253 (1981). The burden reverts back to

the complainant to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that

the agency's reasons were a pretext for discrimination. At all times,

complainant retains the burden of persuasion, and it is his obligation

to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the agency acted on the

basis of a prohibited reason. U.S. Postal Service Board of Governors

v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711, 715-716 (1983).

Assuming that complainant established a prima facie case of discrimination

based on disability and race/national origin, we find that the agency

stated a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its action, i.e.,

that complainant's application contained false or incomplete information

with regard to his criminal records. Since the agency articulated a

legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its actions, the burden returns

to complainant to demonstrate that the agency's articulated reason was

a pretext for discrimination. Complainant must show that the agency's

action is not true or more likely than not motivated by discrimination,

that is, that the action was influenced by legally impermissible criteria.

Absent a showing that the agency's articulated reason was used as a tool

to discriminate against him, complainant cannot prevail. We find that

complainant failed to demonstrate that the agency's articulated reason

for its action was pretextual. We find therefore that the agency did

not discriminate against complainant.

CONCLUSION

According, the agency's decision is affirmed, as modified by this

decision.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

____08-29-02______________

Date

1We note that the reduced penalty was upheld

in an arbitration decision.

2 To establish a prima facie case, a complainant need only present

evidence which, if unrebutted, would support an inference that

the agency's actions resulted from discrimination. See O'Connor

v. Consolidated Coin Caters Corp., 517 U.S. 308, 312 (1996); Enforcement

Guidance on O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caters Corp., EEOC Notice

No. 915.002, n. 4 (September 18, 1996).