Jay W. Jessup, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 3, 2005
05a50383 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 3, 2005)

05a50383

12-03-2005

Jay W. Jessup, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Jay W. Jessup v. United States Postal Service

05A50383

May 3, 2005

.

Jay W. Jessup,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Request No. 05A50383

Appeal No. 01A44812

Agency No. 1J-461-0025-04

DENIAL

The United States Postal Service (agency) timely requested reconsideration

of the decision in Jay W. Jessup v. United States Postal Service, EEOC

Appeal No. 01A44812 (November 29, 2004). EEOC Regulations provide that

the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any

previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that:

(1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a

substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the

agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In the prior decision, the Commission determined that the agency

improperly dismissed the complaint (containing a claim regarding the award

of a bid to a co-worker) on the grounds of untimely EEO Counselor contact.

Complainant argued that he only developed a reasonable suspicion of

discrimination in January 2004, when he learned that the bid was awarded

to a co-worker. The Commission determined that the agency failed to

rebut the complainant's assertion.

In its request for reconsideration, the agency claims that the matter

at issue was already raised in a prior EEO complaint and that it was

accepted for investigation. Specifically, the agency stated that the

issue of complainant not being awarded a bid position was accepted for

investigation by letter dated March 26, 2004 in Agency No. IJ-461-0086-03,

and submits a copy of the letter.

The Commission finds that the agency is now attempting to supplement the

record with evidence that was clearly available on appeal. See La Barrie

v. Department of Health and Human Services, EEOC Request No. 05990951

(March 7, 2002).<1> Therefore, after reconsidering the previous decision

and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet

the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the

Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A44812

remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further right of

administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claim in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claim within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 3, 2005

__________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1We note that the Commission's Order in EEOC Appeal No. 01A44812 directs

the agency to process the subject complaint. If there are additional

grounds that warrant a dismissal of the complaint in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.107 et seq., the agency is not precluded from properly

doing so.