Janet L. Brown, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southwest Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 13, 2012
0120111081 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 13, 2012)

0120111081

02-13-2012

Janet L. Brown, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southwest Area), Agency.




Janet L. Brown,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Southwest Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120111081

Agency No. 4G730010210

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated November 12, 2010, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Part Time Flexible Clerk at the Agency’s Main Postal facility in

Lawton, Oklahoma.

On October 29, 2010, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging

that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the bases of sex

(female), disability, and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity

under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when, on September 31,

2010, she was harassed regarding a modified job offer. According to the

pre-complaint counseling report, Complainant was called into an office

to sign a modified job offer. She alleges that she tried to explain she

had already signed one. However, she was made to sign the papers and

indicated on them that she had previously signed them.

The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §

1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim. The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

Under the regulations set forth at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614, an agency

shall accept a complaint from an aggrieved employee or applicant for

employment who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by

that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or

disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's

federal sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee"

as one who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term,

condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy.

Diaz v. Dep’t of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April

21, 1994). If complainant cannot establish that s/he is aggrieved,

the agency shall dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim.

29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1).

The Commission has held that where, as here, a complaint does not

challenge an agency action or inaction regarding a specific term,

condition, or privilege of employment, a claim of discriminatory

harassment may survive if it alleges conduct that is sufficiently severe

or pervasive to alter the conditions of the complainant’s employment.

See Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 23 (1993). To the

extent Complainant is claiming a discriminatory hostile work environment,

we find that the single event described, even if proven to be true,

would not indicate that Complainant has been subjected to harassment

that was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of her

employment. See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, Request No. 05970077

(March 13, 1997).

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 13, 2012

__________________

Date

2

0120111081

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120111081