01a24834_r
01-28-2003
Jamie A. Sharpe, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Jamie A. Sharpe v. United States Postal Service
01A24834
January 28, 2003
.
Jamie A. Sharpe,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A24834
Agency No. 4F-956-0051-00
DECISION
Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's decision not to
reinstate complainant's complaint of unlawful employment discrimination
that the parties had settled is proper. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504.
On March 16, 2000, the parties entered into a settlement agreement
resolving the complaint. The settlement agreement provided that:
[An identified management official] will reinstate [complainant] on the
active register;
That [complainant] will be available (on the register) to work in Paradise
and Oroville (not Chico);
[The management official] will be available to speak directly with
[complainant] in the event that physical issues arise w/re to employment;
and
[The management official] will consider the possibility of rewarding
the content of the letter that [complainant] misinterpreted during the
course of the job hire process.
Thereafter, complainant alleged that the agency breached the settlement
agreement when he was denied employment on June 15, 2000, even though
he was initially selected for a position following an interview with
the Postmaster on April 17, 2000. Upon review, the Commission finds
that the settlement agreement did not provide for a specific employment
position within the agency. Rather, it provided that complainant would
be reinstated on the active register for employment within the agency.
The record clearly indicates that complainant was interviewed for a
position on April 17, 2000, as a result of this settlement agreement.
It is noted that complainant properly has filed a subsequent complaint
concerning the denial of employment of June 15, 2000, which had been
decided by the agency.<1>
Accordingly, the agency's decision is hereby AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
January 28, 2003
__________________
Date
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision
was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify
that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative
(if applicable), and the agency on:
__________________
Date
______________________________
1It is noted that on July 2, 2002, the agency issued its final action
implementing an EEOC Administrative Judge's finding of discrimination
and the corrective actions concerning the subject matter, Agency
No. 4F-956-0114-00. Thereafter, complainant filed an appeal claiming
that the agency failed to implement the agency's decision; and this
matter is pending before the Commission under EEOC Appeal No. 01A25061.