James R. Welcome, Complainant,v.Gordon R. England, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 15, 2002
01A14664 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 15, 2002)

01A14664

08-15-2002

James R. Welcome, Complainant, v. Gordon R. England, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


James R. Welcome v. Department of Navy

01A14664

August 15, 2002

.

James R. Welcome,

Complainant,

v.

Gordon R. England,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A14664

Agency No.____<1>

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for failure to

contact an EEO Counselor. Complainant sent a formal complaint directly to

the Office of the Assistant Secretary, who forwarded the complaint to the

Office of Human Resources (HRO NOLA) in New Orleans, Louisiana. In its

final decision (FAD) dated July 18, 2001, the agency found no record of

counselor contact on complainant's part, and instructed complainant that

in order to pursue an allegation of discrimination, he was required to

seek EEO counseling by contacting the EEO Office at HRO NOLA. The FAD

then dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2).

On appeal, complainant argues that his complaint was timely filed in

accordance with the applicable regulations since �[his] contact with

[the Assistant Secretary] was sufficient to toll the time limit for

contacting an EEO counselor.� Cox v. Department of Housing and Urban

Development, EEOC Request No. 05980083 (July 30, 1998). However,

the instant complaint was not dismissed for untimely contact with an

EEO counselor, it was dismissed because it �raise[d] a matter that

has not been brought to the attention of a Counselor...� 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(2). Complainant's argument is applicable when a question

arises as to the timeliness of EEO counselor contact in situations

where a complainant ultimately seeks EEO counseling (as the instant

FAD instructs) after first having contacted an agency official logically

connected to the EEO process. However, a complainant cannot circumvent the

important step of EEO counseling by simply sending a complaint directly

to an agency official. We note that complainant has filed previous

complaints of discrimination and therefore, should be familiar with

this procedural requirement. Accordingly, the agency's final decision

dismissing complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 15, 2002

__________________

Date

1 The record indicates that no agency number

was assigned to this complaint.