James H. Wilson, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 30, 2002
01A14457_r (E.E.O.C. Apr. 30, 2002)

01A14457_r

04-30-2002

James H. Wilson, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


James H. Wilson v. United States Postal Service

01A14457

April 30, 2002

.

James H. Wilson,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A14457

Agency No. 4G-752-0255-97

DECISION

Complainant appeals the agency's May 31, 2001 decision dismissing

complainant's complaint. Complainant alleges that he was discriminated

against on the basis of reprisal when, on February 7, 1997, he was

denied advance annual leave. After conducting an investigation,

complainant requested a hearing before an Administrative Judge (AJ).

The AJ remanded the case to the agency upon finding that complainant

failed to demonstrate that he was an aggrieved employee, resulting in an

agency decision dated March 29, 1999, dismissing complainant's complaint

for failure to state a claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).

Complainant appealed that decision to the Commission. The Commission

issued a decision on October 27, 2000, reversing the dismissal and

remanding the complaint for further processing. Wilson v. United States

Postal Serv., EEOC Appeal No. 01994076 (Oct. 27, 2000). The Commission

found that the complaint stated a claim and that the record did not show

that the complaint was moot. Id.

The AJ dismissed complainant's complaint for failure to respond to an

Order to Show Cause. On May 31, 2001, the agency issued a decision

adopting the AJ's decision and dismissing the complaint pursuant to

29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7), for failure to cooperate. Complainant now

appeals from the May 31, 2001 agency dismissal.

According the Order to Show Cause dated December 28, 2000, the AJ desired

more information to determine whether summary judgment was appropriate in

the case. The AJ, in the Order, requested that the agency and complainant

respond to the Order if either party found five listed facts to be

in dispute. Further, the AJ requested that complainant, inter alia,

�provide all information that he has in support of his allegation of

discrimination.� The AJ requested the agency, inter alia, to �provide

all of the information that it has regarding the date on which it first

received the Complainant's request for advance leave.� According to

the AJ's dismissal, �[n]either party responded� causing a �lack [of]

sufficient information to issue a summary decision.� Therefore, the

AJ dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.109(f)(3)(v)

for �for failure to comply with an order of the Administrative Judge.�

The Commission finds that the Order to Show Cause did not notify the

parties that failure to respond to the Order within 15 days may lead

to dismissal. Therefore, we find in the instant circumstances, that it

was complainant's strategic choice as to whether to submit �information

that he has in support of his allegation of discrimination.� The

Commission finds that dismissal under � 1614.107(a)(7) by the agency

was improper. Furthermore, we find that dismissal as a sanction by

the AJ was clearly inappropriate because complainant has not engaged

in any activity different than that of the agency. According to the

AJ's dismissal, �[n]either party responded.� Thus, it is not logical

to take an adverse inference against only complainant. Additionally,

we do not find complainant's conduct improper. Therefore, the matter

shall be remanded for a hearing.

The agency's decision dismissing complainant's complaint is REVERSED

and we REMAND the complaint to the agency for further processing in

accordance with this decision and applicable regulations.

ORDER

The agency shall request the Hearings Unit of the appropriate EEOC

district/field office to schedule a hearing. The agency is directed to

submit a copy of the complaint file to the EEOC Hearings Unit within

15 calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency

shall provide written notification to the Compliance Officer at the

address set forth below that the complaint file has been transmitted to

the Hearings Unit. Thereafter, the Administrative Judge shall issue a

decision on the complaint in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.109, and the

agency shall issue a final action in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.110.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 30, 2002

__________________

Date