James E. Trent, Complainant,v.Dr. James G. Roche, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 22, 2003
01A32405_r (E.E.O.C. Sep. 22, 2003)

01A32405_r

09-22-2003

James E. Trent, Complainant, v. Dr. James G. Roche, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.


James E. Trent v. Department of the Air Force

01A32405

September 22, 2003

.

James E. Trent,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. James G. Roche,

Secretary,

Department of the Air Force,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A32405

Agency No. 9V1M03106

DECISION

Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission concerning his complaint

of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of

the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e

et seq. In a complaint dated January 10, 2003, complainant alleged

that he was subjected to discrimination on the basis of reprisal for

prior EEO activity when his second level supervisor harassed him on a

continuous basis from October 8, 2002 to December 2002 regarding the

following incidents:

1. His second level supervisor elected to change the terms and

conditions of complainant's employment based on an on-the-job-injury

(date not identified).

2. On November 7, 2002, his second level supervisor refused to provide

the CA-2 Form to the complainant regarding his on-the-job injury.

The agency dismissed claim 1 for failure to cooperate, pursuant to 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7). Additionally, the agency dismissed claim 2

for raising the same matters in a grievance procedure, pursuant to 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4).

With regard to claim 1, we find that the claim is more properly dismissed

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1), for failure to state a claim.

The Commission finds that complainant's complaint is too vague to state a

claim under the EEOC regulations. We note that not only does complainant

fail to provide the specific date of the alleged discrimination, but he

also does not explain how he believed that his second level supervisor

changed the terms or conditions of his employment. The agency can not be

expected to investigate a complaint without complainant explaining the

time frames or the alleged action at issue. After reviewing the record

as to claim 1, we find that complainant failed to present a specific

claim of employment discrimination covered by EEOC regulations.

With regard to claim 2, we find that the agency properly dismissed

this claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4), on the ground

that complainant elected to raise the matter in a negotiated grievance

procedure that permits allegations of discrimination. The record reveals

that complainant filed a grievance on October 31, 2002, which concerned

the second level supervisor's refusal to provide the CA-2 Form to the

complainant regarding his on-the-job injury. We find that complainant,

by filing the negotiated grievance before the complaint, made an election

to proceed through the negotiated grievance process and that, once he made

such an election, he could no longer file a complaint on the same matter.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 22, 2003

__________________

Date