Jack R. Williams, Appellant,v.Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 18, 1999
01983064 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 18, 1999)

01983064

03-18-1999

Jack R. Williams, Appellant, v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Jack R. Williams v. Department of the Navy

01983064

March 18, 1999

Jack R. Williams, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01983064

) Agency No. 98-00251-007

Richard J. Danzig, )

Secretary, )

Department of the Navy, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

The Commission finds that the agency's decision dated January 30,

1998 dismissing appellant's complaint on the grounds that appellant

failed to timely contact an EEO Counselor is proper pursuant to 29

C.F.R. �1614.107(b). Appellant argues that he attempted to file an EEO

complaint in 1992 and 1993 but that EEO Counselor A refused to process

such a complaint.

EEO Counselor A provided an affidavit in which EEO Counselor A asserted

that although he did meet in December 1992 with appellant, appellant did

not express a desire to start the EEO process. EEO Counselor A asserted

that he explained the EEO process to appellant and the necessity to

commence EEO processing within 45 days of the discriminatory event,

but that appellant did not choose, at that time in 1992, to pursue the

matter through the EEO process. EEO Counselor A denied ever dissuading

appellant from filing a complaint. The Commission finds that appellant's

bare assertion that he was denied the right to start the EEO process

is insufficient, when rebutted by the statements in EEO Counselor A's

affidavit, to show that appellant attempted to commence the EEO process

prior to September 8, 1997. Appellant's initial contact with the intent

of pursuing EEO counseling on September 8, 1997 was more than 45 days

after the alleged discriminatory incidents (lack of accommodation;

rejection of appellant's attempt to accept incentive pay and retire).

Appellant has not provided any persuasive reason for finding that the

agency should be equitably estopped from claiming that appellant failed

to timely contact an EEO Counselor.

Because of our disposition we do not address whether the agency properly

dismissed the complaint on additional grounds.

The agency's decision dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �l6l4.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

March 18, 1999 Ronnie Blumenthal

DATE Director

Office of Federal Operations