Hyde Park Construction CompanyDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsSep 30, 1981258 N.L.R.B. 849 (N.L.R.B. 1981) Copy Citation HYDE PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Hyde Park Construction Company and Local 67, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' In- ternational Association of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO and Local 131, Plasterers Tenders Union, Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO. Cases 7-CA- 18610(1) and 7-CA-18610(2) September 30, 1981 DECISION AND ORDER BY MEMBERS FANNING, JENKINS, AND ZIMMERMAN Upon charges filed on December 4, 1980, by Local 67, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, herein called Local 67, and by Local 131, Plasterers Tenders Union, Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, herein called Local 131, and duly served on Hyde Park Construction Company, herein called Respondent, the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, by the Re- gional Director for Region 7, issued a consolidated complaint on January 28, 1981, against Respondent, alleging that Respondent had enagaged in and was engaging in unfair labor practices affecting com- merce within the meaning of Section 8(a)(5) and (I) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended. Copies of the charges and the consolidated complaint and notice of hear- ing before an administrative law judge were duly served on the parties to this proceeding. On August 24, 1981, counsel for the General Counsel filed directly with the Board a Motion for Summary Judgment. Subsequently, on August 27, 1981, the Board issued an order transferring the proceeding to the Board and a Notice To Show Cause why the General Counsel's Motion for Sum- mary Judgment should not be granted. Respondent did not file a response to the Notice To Show Cause and the averments of the Motion for Sum- mary Judgment and of the attached supporting ex- hibits and certifications stand uncontroverted. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the Na- tional Labor Relations Board has delegated its au- thority in this proceeding to a three-member panel. Upon the entire record in this proceeding, the Board makes the following: Ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment Section 102.20 of the Board's Rules and Regula- tions, Series 8, as amended, provides as follows: The respondent shall, within 10 days from the service of the complaint, file an answer there- 258 NLRB No. 114 to. The respondent shall specifically admit, deny, or explain each of the facts alleged in the complaint, unless the respondent is without knowledge, in which case the respondent shall so state, such statement operating as a denial. All allegations in the complaint, if no answer is filed, or any allegation in the complaint not specifically denied or explained in an answer filed, unless the respondent shall state in the answer that he is without knowledge, shall be deemed to be admitted to be true and shall be so found by the Board, unless good cause to the contrary is shown. The consolidated complaint and notice of hear- ing served on Respondent specifically states that unless an answer to the consolidated complaint is filed by Respondent within 10 days of service thereof "all of the allegations in the Consolidated Complaint shall be deemed to be admitted true and may be so found by the Board." Further, accord- ing to Exhibit G submitted by counsel for the Gen- eral Counsel, on June 8, 1981, he mailed, by regu- lar mail, a letter notifying Respondent of its failure to file an answer and requesting that Respondent file an answer by June 22, 1981. Counsel for the General Counsel also avers that a few days thereaf- ter he received a telephone call from Lovett D. Thorton, general manager of Respondent. Thorton stated that an answer would be filed shortly. No answer was received from Respondent by June 22, 1981, or by August 17, 1981, the date of the Motion for Summary Judgment. No good cause for failure to file an answer having been shown, in ac- cordance with the rule set forth above, the allega- tions of the complaint are deemed to be admitted to be true. We, accordingly, find as true all the al- legations of the complaint and grant the Motion for Summary Judgment. On the basis of the entire record, the Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF RESPONDENT Respondent is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Michigan. Respond- ent's principal office and place of business is locat- ed at 16629 Meyers Road, Detroit, Michigan, where it is engaged in the installation of plaster and drywall walls and partitions and related work in buildings under construction by other firms. During the year ending December 31, 1980, a rep- resentative period, Respondent in the course and conduct if its business operations, performed serv- ices valued in excess of $100,000, of which services valued in excess of $50,000 were performed for 849 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LAI)OR RELATIONS 1()ARD Turner Construction Company, a New York cor- poration, with offices and jobsites in Michigan, New York, and other States. Turner Construction Company is engaged in the construction industry as a general contractor and on an annual basis de- rives gross revenue in excess of $10 million from its construction activities in States other than New York. We find, on the basis of the foregoing, that Re- spondent is, and has been at all times material herein, an employer engaged in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act, and that it will effectuate the policies of the Act to assert jurisdiction herein. II. THE L.ABOR ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED Local 67, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, and Local 131, Plasterers Tenders Union, Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, are labor or- ganizations within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act. III. THE UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES A. The Unit The following employees of Respondent consti- tute units appropriate for collective-bargaining pur- poses within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act: All journeymen and apprentice plasterers, including all practical plasterers, employed by the Respondent; but excluding all office cleri- cal employees, guards and supervisors as de- fined in the Act. All plasterers tenders employed by the Re- spondent; but excluding all office clerical em- ployees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act. On or about August 27, 1979, Respondent en- tered into collective-bargaining agreements with Local 67 and Local 131. Both collective-bargaining agreements were effective from June 1, 1978, to May 30, 1980, and renewable from year to year thereafter. Both collective-bargaining agreements contained union-security provisions encompassing Respondent's employees in the units described above. The collective-bargaining agreements, re- ferred to above, were renewed by their own terms on May 30, 1980, and are now in effect between the parties. At all times material herein, and by virtue of the successive collective-bargaining agree- ments described above, Local 67 and Local 131 have been the representatives for purposes of col- lective bargaining of all employees in the units de- scribed above and continue to be the exclusive rep- resentatives within the meaning of Section 9(a) of the Act. B. Respondent s Refusal To Bargain and Unilateral Change in Terrn.s and Conditions of Employment The collective-bargaining agreements described in section A, above, require, inter alia. that Re- spondent make monthly payments to certain desig- nated fringe benefit funds. They also require that Respondent submit monthly reports to the Unions indicating the amount owed per employee to the various fringe benefit funds. Since on or about June 4, 1980, Respondent has failed to submit both the monthly payments and the monthly reports. Addi- tionally, since on or about June 4, 1980, Respond- ent has, on dates well within its knowledge, failed to pay to its employees the wages due them under the collective-bargaining agreements. Accordingly, we find that Respondent has, since on or about June 4, 1980, and at all times thereaf- ter, unilaterally, and without notice to Local 67 and Local 131, evaded, breached, and modified the terms of the collective-bargaining agreements be- tween it and Local 67 and Local 131, respectively. By its conduct Respondent has failed to bargain with the Unions as the exclusive representatives of the employees in the appropriate units, and Re- spondent has therefore engaged in and is engaging in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Sec- tion 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act. IV. THE EFFECT OF THE UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES UPON COMMERCE The activities of Respondent set forth in section III, above, occurring in connection with its oper- ations described in section I, above, have a close, intimate, and substantial relationship to trade, traf- fic, and commerce among the several States and tend to lead to labor disputes burdening and ob- structing commerce and the free flow of com- merce. V. THE REMEDY Having found that Respondent has engaged in and is engaging in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act, we shall order that it cease and desist therefrom, and take certain affirmative action designed to effectu- ate the policies of the Act. The Board, upon the basis of the foregoing facts and the entire record, makes the following: 50 HYDIE PARK CONSTRUCTION C()MPANY CONCIUSIONS OFi LAW I. Hyde Park Construction Company is an em- ployer engaged in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act. 2. Local 67, Operating Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, and Local 131, Plasterers Tenders Union, Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, are labor or- ganizations within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act. 3. The following units constitute units appropri- ate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act: All journeymen and apprentice plasterers, including all practical plasterers, employed by the Respondent; but excluding all office cleri- cal employees, guards and supervisors as de- fined in the Act. All plasterers tenders employed by the Re- spondent; but excluding all office clerical em- ployees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act. 4. Since August 27, 1979, by virtue of successive collective-bargaining agreements, the above-named labor organizations have been and are currently the exclusive representatives of all employees in the aforesaid appropriate units for the purposes of col- lective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(a) of the Act. 5. By failing on or about June 4, 1980, and at all times thereafter, to make monthly payments to cer- tain designated fringe benefit funds, as required by its collective-bargaining agreements with the above-named labor organizations, Respondent has engaged in and is engaging in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(a)(5) of the Act. 6. By failing on or about June 4, 1980, and at all times thereafter, to submit certain monthly reports to the above-named labor organizations indicating the amount owed per employee to the various fringe benefit funds, as required by the respective collective-bargaining agreements between Respond- ent and the above-named labor organizations, Re- spondent has engaged in and is engaging in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(a)(5) of the Act. 7. By failing on or about June 4, 1980, and on other dates well within Respondent's knowledge, to pay its employees the wages due them under the collective-bargaining agreements between itself and the above-named labor organizations, Respondent has engaged in and is engaging in unfair labor prac- tices within the meaning of Section 8(a)(5) of the Act. 8. By the aforesaid conduct, Respondent has in- terfered with, restrained, and coerced, and is inter- fering with, restraining, and coercing, employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed them in Sec- tion 7 of the Act. and thereby has engaged in and is engaging in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(a)(1) of the Act. 9. The aforesaid unfair labor practices are unfair labor practices affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act. ORDER Pursuant to Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Re- lations Board hereby orders that the Respondent, Hyde Park Construction Company, Detroit, Michi- gan, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall: 1. Cease and desist from: (a) Failing to make monthly payments to certain designated fringe benefit funds as provided for in the collective-bargaining agreements described in section A, above. (b) Failing to submit certain monthly reports in- dicating the amount owed per employee to various fringe benefit funds as provided for in the collec- tive-bargaining agreements between Hyde Park Construction Company and Local 67, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Asso- ciation of the United States and Canada, AFL- CIO, and Local 131, Plasterers Tenders Union, La- borers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, the exclusive bargaining representatives of its employees in the following, respective, ap- propriate units: All journeymen and apprentice plasterers, including all practical plasterers, employed by Hyde Park Construction Company; but ex- cluding all office clerical employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act. All plasterers tenders employed by the Hyde Park Construction Company; but excluding all office clerical employees, guards and supervi- sors as defined in the Act. (c) Failing to pay its employees the wages due them under the collective-bargaining agreements described in section A, above. (d) In any like or related manner interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees in the ex- ercise of the rights guaranteed them in Section 7 of the Act. 2. Take the following affirmative action which the Board finds will effectuate the policies of the Act: 851 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (a) Honor and abide by the terms and conditions of employment provided for in the collective-bar- gaining agreements with Local 67, Operative Plas- terers' and Cement Masons' International Associ- ation of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, and Local 131, Plasterers Tenders Union, Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO. (b) Make all payments owed to the designated fringe benefit funds as required by the collective- bargaining agreements. (c) Reimburse any employee for any expenses in- curred by the employees due to the failure of Re- spondent to maintain any health or hospitalization plan in effect by failing to pay the contractually re- quired amounts, with interest thereon to be com- puted in the manner prescribed in Florida Steel Corporation, 231 NLRB 651 (1977). (d) Provide the Unions with monthly reports in- dicating the amounts owed to the various fringe benefit funds per employee, retroactive to June 4, 1980. (e) Reimburse all employees for all unpaid wages at the rates set forth in the collective-bargaining agreements, with interest thereon to be computed in the manner prescribed in Florida Steel Corpora- tion, 231 NLRB 651 (1979).1 (f) Preserve and, upon request, make available to the Board or its agents, for examination and copy- ing, all records necessary to analyze the payments owed to the fringe benefit funds and the employees as set forth under the terms of the Order. (g) Upon request, bargain in good faith with Local 67, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, and Local 131, Plasterers Tenders Union, Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, as the exclu- sive bargaining representatives of its employees in the respective appropriate units described above. (h) Post at its Detroit, Michigan, facility copies of the attached notice marked "Appendix." 2 Copies of said notice, on forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 7, after being duly signed by Respondent's representative, shall be posted by Re- spondent immediately upon receipt thereof, and be maintained by it for 60 consecutive days thereafter, in conspicuous places, including all places where notices to employees are customarily posted. Rea- sonable steps shall be taken by Respondent to See, generally. htis Plumbing d earing Co., 138 NLRB 716 (1962). In accordance with his dissent in Olympic Medical Corporation, 250 NLRB 146 (1980), Member Jenkins would award interest on the backpa due based on the formula set forth therein. 2 In the event that this Order is enforced by a Judgment of a United States Court of Appeals, the words in the notice reading "Posted by Order of the National Labor Relations Board" shall read "Posted Pursu- ant to a Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the National Labor Relations Board" insure that said notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material. (i) Notify the Regional Director for Region 7, in writing, within 20 days from the date of this Order, what steps have been taken to comply herewith. APPENDIX NOTICE To EMPLOYEES POSTED BY ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD An Agency of the United States Government WE WILL NOT fail to make monthly pay- ments to certain designated fringe benefit funds as provided for in the collective-bargain- ing agreements with Local 67, Operative Plas- terers' and Cement Masons' International As- sociation of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, and Local 131, Plasterers Tenders Union, Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, as the exclusive bargain- ing representatives of the employees in the bargaining units described below. WE WILL. NOT fail to submit monthly reports indicating the amount owed per employee to the various fringe benefit funds as provided for in the collective-bargaining agreements with the above-named labor organizations. WE WILL NOT fail to pay our employees the wages due them as provided for in the collec- tive-bargaining agreements with the above- named labor organizations. WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere with, restrain, or coerce our employ- ees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act. WE WILL honor and abide by the terms and conditions of employment provided for in the collective-bargaining agreements with Local 67. Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, and Local 131, Plas- terers Tenders Union, Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO. WE WILL make all payments owed to the designated fringe benefit funds as required by the collective-bargaining agreements. WE WIl.L. reimburse any employee, with in- terest, for any expenses incurred by the em- ployees due to our failure to maintain any health or hospitalization plan in effect by fail- ing to pay the contractually required amounts. WE WILL provide the above-named labor organizations with monthly reports indicating the amounts owed the various fringe benefit funds per employee. 852 HYDE PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY WE WILL reimburse all employees for all unpaid wages at the rates set forth in the col- lective-bargaining agreements, with interest. WE WILL, upon request, bargain in good faith with Local 67, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, and Local 131, Plasterers Tenders Union, Labor- ers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, as the exclusive representative of the employees in the bargaining units de- scribed below.The bargaining units are: All journeymen and apprentice plasterers, including all practical plasterers, employed by Hyde Park Construction Company; but excluding all office clerical employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the Act. All plasterers tenders employed by the Hyde Park Construction Company; but excluding all office clerical employees, guards and su- pervisors as defined in the Act. HYDE PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 853 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation