Helen E. Smith, Complainant,v.Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Army and Air Force Exchange Service), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 10, 2003
05A31097 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 10, 2003)

05A31097

09-10-2003

Helen E. Smith, Complainant, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, (Army and Air Force Exchange Service), Agency.


Helen E. Smith v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service

05A31097

September 10, 2003

.

Helen E. Smith,

Complainant,

v.

Donald H. Rumsfeld,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

(Army and Air Force Exchange Service),

Agency.

Request No. 05A31097

Appeal No. 01A14372

Agency Nos. 98-047; 98-085; 98-146; 99-122; 98-077; 98-108; 99-029

Hearing No. 301-99-5468X

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Helen E. Smith (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider

the decision in Helen E. Smith v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service,

EEOC Appeal No. 01A14372 (November 21, 2002). EEOC Regulations provide

that the Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous

Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1)

the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a

substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the

agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b). However, we remind complainant that

a "request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission."

Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614

(rev. Nov. 9, 1999), at 9-17.

In her request for reconsideration, complainant reiterates arguments

previously raised on appeal. The agency makes no contentions. After a

review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the previous

decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request

fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the

decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC

Appeal No. 01A14372 remains the Commission's final decision. There is no

further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission

on this request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this

decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 10, 2003

__________________

Date