05a00870
02-07-2001
Guillermo A. Rose, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southeast Area), Agency.
Guillermo A. Rose v. United States Postal Service
05A00870
February 7, 2001
.
Guillermo A. Rose,
Complainant,
v.
William J. Henderson,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Southeast Area),
Agency.
Request No. 05A00870
Appeal No. 01991400
Agency No. 4-H-330-0326-97
DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
The complainant initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in Guillermo
A. Rose v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01991400
(April 24, 2000).<1> EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may,
in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision where the
requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved
a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2)
the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).
Complainant alleged discrimination based on his race (Black/Hispanic),
national origin (Panamanian), disability (post traumatic stress syndrome),
and retaliation (prior EEO activity) when he was harassed about his job
and the need to provide updated medical documentation on April 2 and
3, 1997.
The appellate decision affirmed the final agency decision which found
that complainant was not discriminated as alleged. Specifically, the
agency noted that, other than complainant's unsupported assertions,
the record was completely devoid of evidence which would support a
finding of discrimination. While complainant alleged that he was forced
(with the threat of termination) to use an hour of his vacation time to
go to the Veterans Administration (VA) and seek an earlier appointment
to obtain required medical documentation, the record does not support
this allegation. Rather, the record shows complainant made the decision
himself to use annual leave to go to the VA. In addition, the record
indicates that complainant was required to provide medical updates in
accordance with an earlier EEOC appellate decision.
Complainant raises no new argument in his request for reconsideration.
Accordingly, after a review of the complainant's request for
reconsideration, the previous decision, and the entire record, the
Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to
deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01991400 remains
the Commission's final decision. There is no further right of
administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request
for reconsideration.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right
of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the
right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District
Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive
this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant
in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department
head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to
file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be
filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right
to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
February 7, 2001
__________________
Date
1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply
to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the
administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply
the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.