Gregory G. Lockett, Complainant,v.Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 12, 2008
0120083691 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 12, 2008)

0120083691

11-12-2008

Gregory G. Lockett, Complainant, v. Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.


Gregory G. Lockett,

Complainant,

v.

Michael B. Mukasey,

Attorney General,

Department of Justice,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120083691

Agency No. F086493

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated August 13, 2008, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim.

In a complaint dated June 13, 2008, complainant alleged that he was

subjected to discrimination on the basis of age (52) when he learned that

Border Patrol Agents had their mandatory retirement age increased to 60,

while FBI Special Agents had a mandatory retirement age of 57.

The Commission has consistently held that complaints challenging

statutorily created exceptions to the ADEA fail to state a claim.

See Campbell v. Department of Justice, EEOC Request No. 05960550 (April

17, 1997). Moreover, the Commission has specifically found that both 5

U.S.C. � 8335, which sets forth the mandatory retirement ages for federal

law enforcement officers and firefighters, as well as its companion

statute 5 U.S.C. � 3307 (d), which mandates age limits for original

appointments to federal law enforcement positions, are valid statutory

exceptions to the ADEA. See DiLuglio v. Department of Defense, EEOC

Appeal No. 01964785 (July 27, 1998); Sobko v. Department of the Treasury,

EEOC Request No. 05920106 (March 12, 1992).

Therefore, we conclude that an agency may implement mandatory separations

under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. � 8335 without resulting in an

actionable claim under the ADEA. Further, we note that complainant is

only 52 years old and has not applied for retirement and has not been

told that he must retire. Accordingly, the agency's final decision

dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 12, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120083691

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120083691