Gerard Sheehy, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (New York Metro Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 4, 2011
0120100517 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 4, 2011)

0120100517

01-04-2011

Gerard Sheehy, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (New York Metro Area), Agency.


Gerard Sheehy,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(New York Metro Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120100517

Agency No. 4A088008209

DECISION

BACKGROUND

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's final decision dated October 20, 2009, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

On September 29, 2009, Complainant filed a formal EEO complaint. Therein, Complainant alleged that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of disability, age, and in reprisal for prior protected EEO activity.

In its final decision dated October 20, 2009, the Agency determined that Complainant's complaint was comprised of the following claims:

1. On April 24, 2009, Complainant was ordered to sort a bucket of flats, was questioned by the Postmaster about his request to go to the bathroom; and was denied a union steward; and

2. On May 4, 2009, Complainant was ordered to stop viewing a magazine, was denied a union steward, and was brought into the office where he was berated by the Postmaster.

The Agency dismissed Complainant's complaint for failure to state a claim. Specifically, the Agency found that the alleged incidents are not sufficiently severe or pervasive to state an actionable claim of harassment.

CONTENTIONS ON APPEAL

Complainant does not submit a statement or brief in support of his appeal.

The Agency requests that we affirm its final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

Upon review of the record, we find that the Agency properly dismissed Complainant's complaint. A complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the complainant cannot prove a set of facts in support of the claim which would entitle the complainant to relief. The trier of fact must consider all of the alleged harassing incidents and remarks, and considering them together in the light most favorable to the complainant, determine whether they are sufficient to state a claim. Cobb v. Dep't of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970077 (Mar. 13, 1997). We find that the alleged incidents are not sufficiently severe or pervasive to state an actionable claim of harassment. In addition, regarding the basis of reprisal, we find that the alleged incidents are not reasonably likely to deter Complainant or others from engaging in protected activity.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 4, 2011

__________________

Date

2

0120100517

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120100517