01A14092_r
09-21-2001
Geraldine Kierum, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Geraldine Kierum v. United States Postal Service
01A14092
September 21, 2001
.
Geraldine Kierum,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A14092
Agency Nos. 1G-781-0016-01 and 1G-781-0026-01
DECISION
Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's decision dated May 4,
2001, dismissing complainant's complaints for failure to state a claim
is proper pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). In her complaints,
complainant alleged that on October 23, 2000, her manager made derogatory
remarks using foul language, and on November 2, 2000, after sending the
senior manager a �cc: mail� message requesting information under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), she was given a letter stating that
she was not allowed to use �cc: mail� for personal use.
With regard to the October 23, 2000 incident, the Commission has
consistently held that a remark or comment unaccompanied by concrete
action is not a direct and personal deprivation sufficient to render
an individual aggrieved for the purposes of Title VII. Henry v. USPS,
EEOC Request No. 05940695 (February 9, 1995). There is no evidence in
the record that complainant was subjected to any disciplinary action
as a result of the alleged demeaning statements from her manager.
With regard to the November 2, 2000 letter, the Commission finds that the
senior manager, merely responding to complainant's FOIA request, informed
complainant that he received her FOIA request, via �cc: mail,� which was
properly forwarded to an appropriate FOIA Officer. It is noted that other
than the senior manager's statement that �cc: mail� was not to be used
for personal use, there is no evidence in the record that complainant was
actually denied usage of �cc: mail� in connection with her employment.
With regard to the alleged processing of FOIA request, it is noted that
the Commission does not have jurisdiction over the matter. See Gaines
v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970386 (June 12, 1997).
Accordingly, the agency's decision is hereby AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
September 21, 2001
__________________
Date